Interest of Justice is a nonprofit organization fighting for pandemic accountability, Nuremberg Code enforcement, and human rights through the courts — simultaneously litigating against WHO, FDA, HHS, and DOD.
Compelling the FDA to respond to a 132-page Citizens Petition proving mRNA products meet the FDA's own definition of gene therapy. If mRNA is gene therapy, Nuremberg Code protections apply — and informed consent was violated on a global scale.
Court: U.S. District Court, D.C. • Law: 28 U.S.C. §1361
● Filing ImminentExpert witnesses including former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon and pharma executive Dr. Sasha Latypova are prepared to testify under oath in a crimes against humanity case naming Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and former Dutch PM Mark Rutte.
Court: Amsterdam Court of Appeals • Ruling: April 9, 2026
● Awaiting RulingIOJ won a default judgment against WHO after they refused to comply with court orders. First-ever contempt finding against an international organization in this context. WHO's IHR amendments were declared adopted in violation of international law.
Court: Costa Rica • Next: 79th WHA, May 2026
● Judgment WonFor the first time in history, three independent legal proceedings on three continents are converging simultaneously — and IOJ is fighting in all three.
Follow the Full Series on SubstackInterest of Justice is a 501(c)(4) nonprofit organization founded to ensure that international law, human rights protections, and the Nuremberg Code are enforced — not just for the privileged, but for everyone.
IOJ files legal actions, coordinates global advocacy campaigns, and provides educational content on international health law, pandemic accountability, and human rights. We are entirely reader-supported with zero corporate funding.
In 2022, IOJ helped coordinate 50,000 legal demands that successfully stopped the first round of IHR amendments at the World Health Assembly. In 2025, IOJ won a landmark default judgment against WHO in Costa Rica. Now we're expanding to three simultaneous legal fronts.
Using customary international law (confirmed in Abdullahi v. Pfizer, 2d Cir. 2009) to hold institutions accountable for non-consensual experimentation.
Coordinating litigation across U.S., European, and Latin American courts to create overlapping accountability pressure.
Every claim backed by court filings, FOIA responses, regulatory contradictions, and official documents. Evidence speaks louder than opinion.
Zero corporate funding. Zero pharmaceutical money. Every dollar comes from people who believe the law should protect everyone.
IOJ is fighting on three legal fronts on three continents with zero corporate funding. Your support makes court filings, legal research, travel to hearings, and continued enforcement possible.
All IOJ articles are free because everyone deserves to know what's happening in these cases. Paid subscriptions and donations fund the legal fight.
Read Free on Substack