The claimants' filings · On the timeline
Letter
7 Dec 2025
7 Dec 2025
200.360.223/01 · Court of Appeal (Amsterdam)
Expert video statements sent to the Amsterdam appeal court
Three applicants (Stassen)
Filed for the claimants · every defendant denies the claims; the court has not ruled
In 30 seconds
A cover letter sending the Amsterdam Court of Appeal five expert video messages and four written reports in the evidence appeal (case 200.360.223). The applicants say this evidence bears on whether their appeal is admissible.
Cheat sheet
- Videos (with Dutch subtitles) came from Latypova, Watt, Yeadon, Sansone and Fitts.
- Written reports came from Latypova, Watt, Yeadon and Sansone, as digital files with many links.
- The applicants say the trial is not fair unless these specific experts are heard by a judge.
- Copies on USB went to the defendants' lawyers.
Key passages · underlined
Video messages (with Dutch subtitles) to your court showing that the Covid-19 injections are indistinguishable from a bioweapon, from the following experts:
The trial is not fair within the meaning of Article 6 of the ECHR as long as it is not precisely those experts put forward by the applicants heard before a judge.
Every defendant denies the claims, and the court has not ruled on them. Allegations are the claimants' pleaded positions, quoted as theirs. This is analysis and commentary, not legal advice. Interest of Justice is not a party to the case.