The claimants' filings · On the timeline
7 Dec 2025
C/17/190788 · District Court of the Northern Netherlands, Leeuwarden
Claimants send the court expert videos and reports on a USB stick
Claimants (Stassen)
Filed for the claimants · every defendant denies the claims; the court has not ruled
In 30 seconds
A letter from the claimants' lawyer to the court filing video messages and written reports from five experts. On the claimants' account, these support their argument that the injections are a biological weapon. The letter asks for an early hearing and urges the judges to file a criminal complaint.
Cheat sheet
- The lawyer files a USB stick with Dutch-subtitled video messages to the court from five experts.
- Videos — Sasha Latypova, Katherine Watt, Michael Yeadon, Joseph Sansone and Catherine Austin Fitts; written reports from the first four.
- The claimants say this is 'lawful and convincing evidence' for their biological-weapon argument; the defendants dispute it.
- They ask for an oral hearing as soon as possible and send download links so judges and defence lawyers can watch quickly.
- They repeat that, in their view, the judges should file a criminal complaint against the defendants.
Key passages · underlined
Video messages (with Dutch subtitles) addressed to your court, demonstrating that the Covid-19 injections are indistinguishable from a biological weapon, provided by the following experts:
it should be reiterated that, in the plaintiffs’ view, it is incumbent upon you, as the presiding and responsible judges in this case, to file a criminal complaint against the defendants on suspicion of democide and genocide respectively.
Every defendant denies the claims, and the court has not ruled on them. Allegations are the claimants' pleaded positions, quoted as theirs. This is analysis and commentary, not legal advice. Interest of Justice is not a party to the case.