Claimants' reply — new exhibits and a wider claim against all 17

This case is being handled by Mr drs. A.G.W. van Kessel, lawyer at the law firm Van Kessel Advocatuur, with offices in Leeuwarden (8938 AG) at Orionweg 47E, and by Mr P.W.H. Stassen, lawyer at the law firm Stassen & Kemps advocaten in (5611 CV) Eindhoven at Nachtegaallaan 6;

District Court of the Northern Netherlands

Seat: Leeuwarden

Docket date: Wednesday 11 June 2025 at 10:00

Case reference: C/17/190788

Docket number: 2023/172

REPLY

and

AMENDMENT (INCREASE) OF CLAIM PURSUANT TO ART. 130 DCCP

in the matter of:

1. Mr [redacted], residing in Sneek;

2. Ms [redacted], residing in Sneek;

3. Mr [redacted], residing in Sneek;

4. Ms [redacted], residing in Doetinchem;

5. Mr [redacted], residing in Doetinchem;

6. Ms [redacted] †;

7. Mr [redacted], residing in Leeuwarden;

- claimants -

Lawyers: Mr drs. A.G.W. van Kessel and Mr P.W.H. Stassen

versus:

(government officials)

1. Mr EVERHARDUS ITE HOFSTRA, residing in [redacted];

2. Mr JAAP TAMINO VAN DISSEL, residing in [redacted];

3. Ms MARIA PETRONELLA GERARDA KOOPMANS, residing in [redacted];

4. Mr MARK RUTTE, residing in [redacted];

5. Ms SIGRID AGNES MARIA KAAG, residing in the municipality of [redacted];

6. Mr HUGO MATTHEÜS DE JONGE, residing in [redacted];

7. Mr ERNST JOHAN KUIPERS, currently without known residence or place of abode;

8. Mr DIEDERIK ANTONIUS MARIA PAULUS JOHANNES GOMMERS, residing in [redacted];

9. Mr WOPKE BASTIAAN HOEKSTRA, currently without known residence or place of abode;

10. CORNELIA VAN NIEUWENHUIZEN, currently without known residence or place of abode;

Lawyers: Mr R.W. Veldhuis and Ms M.E.A. Möhring

(pharmaceutical industry)

11. Mr ALBERT BOURLA, residing in [redacted];

Lawyers: Mr D.C. Roessingh and Ms M.G. Bredenoord-Spoek

(mass media)

12. Ms GISELLE JACQUELINE MARIE-THÉRÈSE VAN CANN, residing in [redacted];

13. Mr PAUL JANSEN, currently without known residence or place of abode;

Lawyers: Mr L. Broers and Mr R.H.W. Lamme

(non-governmental organisation (NGO, WEF))

14. Mr FEIKE SIJBESMA, residing in [redacted];

Lawyers: Mr R.W. Veldhuis and Ms M.E.A. Möhring

15. Mr WILLIAM HENRY BILL GATES III, residing in [redacted]

Lawyer: Mr W. Heemskerk

(semi-public sector)

16. Ms AGNES CATHARINA VAN DER VOORT-KANT, currently without known residence or place of abode:

Lawyer: Mr A.H. Ekker

(government)

17. The STATE OF THE NETHERLANDS, having its seat in The Hague;

Lawyers: Mr R.W. Veldhuis and Ms M.E.A. Möhring

- defendants -

The claimants, hereinafter referred to as '[redacted] et al.', respectfully state and submit by way of reply:

I. General part [fn 1]

1. [redacted] et al. dispute everything that the defendants, hereinafter 'Hofstra et al.' and 'defendants' respectively, have asserted in their statements of defence, unless the facts asserted are consistent with what is stated in the summons of [redacted] et al. or are expressly acknowledged as true in this reply. In this respect, [redacted] et al. maintain the assertions made in the summons. The reasoned denial of all facts, circumstances and data asserted by the State et al. lies in the fact that the facts, circumstances and data asserted by [redacted] et al. are irreconcilable with those asserted by the defendants. In view of this, [redacted] et al. expressly address in their reply only a limited number of (sub)topics from the statements of defence.

2. The reading guide included in the initiating summons also applies to this reply, with the proviso that what is stated outside the general part of this submission likewise applies to all defendants, so that, in assessing the liability of any one of the defendants, regard must also be had to what [redacted] et al. have asserted and submitted by way of evidence in respect of the other defendants.

3. [redacted] et al. expressly assert that all the defendants had and have knowledge of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset and are (co-)executors of it; what one defendant knows and knew, the other defendant also knows and knew. Against this background, [redacted] et al. have also based their claims against the defendants on group liability, because the defendants committed their unlawful acts and/or omissions as members of the group (executors of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset).

4. In their statements of defence, the defendants show that they prefer the lie to the Truth. In their submissions, the defendants let the lie reign. That lie was raised by [redacted] et al. once before, namely at the close of the oral hearing on the jurisdiction motion brought by Gates. At the close of that oral hearing, Mr Van Kessel, on the instructions of [redacted] et al., remarked that he would return in these proceedings to the 'preferred reality'. That preferred reality is a large-scale lie set up and maintained (in part) by the de facto power holders and their executors, including the defendants.

5. That the defendants, after reading the summons, persist in their denials and cannot muster any empathy whatsoever for the terrible situation in which many people worldwide, including [redacted] et al., have ended up as a result of the measures taken in connection with the Covid-19 pandemic pretended in the preferred reality and of the toxic Covid-19 mRNA injections, speaks volumes. This fact constitutes important evidence against the defendants.

[fn 1] Further to para. 3.2 of the judgment of your court of 5 February 2025.

6. In their defence, the defendants raise the question [fn 2] of why these events asserted by [redacted] et al. in the context of the Great Reset would (or could) actually manifest themselves, and remark that this remains unclear after reading the summons. Specifically in response to this question raised by the defendants, [redacted] et al., for the purposes of the procedural debate and the mutual understanding it requires, address the subject of the preferred reality in this introductory chapter of the reply.

7. In the programme Wakker Nederland (WNL) on Sunday 15 April 2018, Major General (retired), and since 2003 also adviser to NATO, Mr Van Kappen, confirmed the existence and the purpose of the preferred reality. He indicated that the preferred reality is nowadays brought about as a project by means of large-scale information operations. With those information operations, facts and events are manipulated in such a way that a preferred reality is projected onto the civilian population, including [redacted] et al. Van Kappen calls this 'telefast reality'. Van Kappen leaves no misunderstanding whatsoever that the defendants take part in this. The reason for the existence of what Van Kappen calls the information operation is a strategic interest. Van Kappen did not state precisely which strategic interest is served, but with his statements confirmed a strategic interest in bringing about large-scale societal changes. In this interview Van Kappen also acknowledged the existence of secret, large-scale, top-down information operations serving this covert strategic interest. It was also remarkable that Van Kappen left no misunderstanding whatsoever that 'all parties' take part in what he called information operations. By speaking of the manipulation of facts and events, Van Kappen clearly confirmed that the aim is to turn true facts and events into disinformation, with (among other things) the strategic aim of laying down a preferred reality among one's own population (including [redacted] et al.). As set out in the summons, this is, at its core, precisely the deception of which a large part of the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., became the victim. In proof of the foregoing, the recording of WNL of Sunday 15 April 2018 and a Wikipedia printout concerning the curriculum vitae of Van Kappen are submitted as exhibit 92.

8. The preferred reality has many facets. One important part of the preferred reality is a false picture of who the de facto power holders and their executors are. In the preferred reality, the parties live in a democratic state governed by the rule of law, ultimate power lies with the people's representatives, and the ministers have the task of carrying out the will of the people. In the democratic state governed by the rule of law, that power is limited by the law by which the State considers itself bound and on which the people's representatives have no influence (fundamental rights). If that law is in dispute, the courts decide on it in the highest instance.

[fn 2] See, for example, the final sentence at paragraph 1.4 of the statement of defence of the State et al.: 'Wáárom dit alles zou gebeuren, blijft daarbij overigens na lezing van de dagvaarding onduidelijk.' ['Why all this would happen, incidentally, remains unclear after reading the summons.']

9. In the preferred reality, alongside or above (supranationally) the state governed by the rule of law there exist only intergovernmental organisations whose purpose is to safeguard the interests of the affiliated constitutional states through international cooperation. Important players in this field are the United Nations and NATO. These intergovernmental organisations work together with private bodies, which in the summons are referred to as NGOs. NGOs that are important for this case are the World Economic Forum (WEF) and the World Health Organisation (WHO). In the preferred reality, these NGOs, too, would serve exclusively the interests of the democratic constitutional states and their citizens.

10. In reality, however, the de facto power holders and their executors are not the people's representatives, nor the courts. None of the other parties mentioned above is subject to democratic control. As a result, the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., has no real influence on government. These organisations, supported by the defendants, do all take part in manipulating facts and events in such a way that the Truth is erased and replaced by a preferred reality. The Great Reset is driven precisely by these powers and forces, to which the de facto power holders and their executors, including the defendants, have - as their submissions show - completely surrendered themselves.

11. The Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport and First Deputy Prime Minister in the now caretaker Schoof cabinet, Marie-Fleur (Fleur) Agema, stated before the House of Representatives on 27 October 2024 that shortly after taking office as Minister she had been briefed on resilience and its significance for her portfolio of 'pandemic preparedness'. In doing so, the Minister publicly acknowledged that, by accepting her mandate, she is under the direction of the National Coordinator for Counterterrorism (NCTV) and, under its direction, carries out the NATO assignments she has accepted, 'and that is painful'. A video of this public confession by the Minister of Health, Welfare and Sport of 27 October 2024 is submitted as exhibit 93. Which NATO assignments are involved in the 'pandemic preparedness' she referred to is apparent, among other things, from interdepartmental email correspondence of her ministry dated 3 June 2020 [fn 3]. A copy of this email is submitted as exhibit 94. This email shows that interdepartmental consultations were held on preparing the political position on a proposal initiated by the USA (Pentagon) for building up emergency stockpiles within the NATO framework in relation to Covid-19. In this correspondence the question is raised whether this proposal initiated by the USA (Pentagon) actually falls within NATO's mandate. This quite obviously concerns building up stockpiles of Covid-19 injections as part of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

[fn 3] This correspondence therefore dates from before the start of the Covid-19 injection campaign, in which the message projected in the preferred reality was that 'vaccination is the only way out of the crisis'. A period in which, in the preferred reality, large-scale testing for 'corona infections' was carried out in the Netherlands. See in this connection exhibit 23 to the summons, the plea of Frank Ruesink to Hugo de Jonge of 16 April 2020.

12. The NATO guidelines (guidance) concerning the NATO doctrine for StratCom, PsyOps and InfoOps as methods for bringing about a preferred reality have been published on the website of the government of the United Kingdom. The member states must each give their own shape to this NATO doctrine according to a blueprint imposed by NATO. Given the extreme nature and the large scale of the activities that take place under this doctrine, there is an immensely great influence on the perception and experience of the civilian population. This NATO doctrine concerns precisely the same information operation and 'telefast reality' about which Van Kappen, as NATO adviser, made his public confession.

13. StratCom (Centre of Excellence for Strategic Communication) is a NATO body based in Riga, Latvia, whose task is to conduct Information Operations (InfoOps) and Psychological Operations (PsyOps). These activities qualify as a modern form of propaganda.

14. Within StratCom the narratives are forged that are implemented and protected by means of InfoOps and PsyOps. For the effectiveness of these clandestine, covert military operations a consistent narrative is crucial. In the context of Covid-19: The Great Reset, NATO, on the instructions of the USA (Pentagon), implemented and protected the narrative that Covid-19 is a disease that arose as a result of the Sars-Cov2 virus, which passed from a bat to a human at an animal market in Wuhan.

15. Because the defendants in these proceedings, as Agema also states, are bound by NATO objectives and must therefore serve the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, the defendants - and, it may be assumed, their respective litigation lawyers - are not permitted to deviate from this narrative. Their statements of defence bear witness to this. The documents published on the United Kingdom website concerning the NATO doctrine are submitted as exhibit 95.

16. As regards the role and objectives of StratCom, it is equally true that there is a great difference between the Truth and the preferred reality. In the preferred reality, StratCom operates within the mandate of NATO as a defensive alliance against foreign military attacks. The Truth, however, is that NATO is a ruthless executive body in the service of the de facto power holders for carrying out (or having carried out), among other things, the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. Characteristic of these projects, which are carried out in part by StratCom, is that they are directed against the states' own civilian populations, with the ultimate aim of arriving at a New World Order by way of a Great Reset. Proof of the fact that NATO's so-called mandate - which the interdepartmental email of 3 June 2020 (exhibit 94) also mentions - is a farce: the StratCom Program of Work for the year 2024 (exhibit 96) shows that StratCom's information operations and PsyOps also extend to the narratives established and implemented by StratCom concerning Climate Change, mass immigration and the Ukraine conflict.

17. It should be clear that in the preferred reality it is not NATO's task to engage in manipulating the population of the member states in order to keep them in a preferred reality. The Truth, however, is that NATO, as a ruthless executive organisation, acts against its own civilian population, and the defendants fully support these actions and help carry them out in the context of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

With regard to the role of NATO discussed in this introduction in relation to the NATO doctrine, it should be noted that NATO, too, forms part of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset set out in the summons, and that the implementation of the Great Reset is a project in which, as Van Kappen puts it, all parties take part. These parties include, among others, the UN, the WEF, NATO, the WHO, the EU and the State of the Netherlands. In this connection the summons dealt extensively with the roll-out of the UN Agendas 21 and 2030 in order ultimately to arrive at the New World Order by means of a Great Reset. The Great Reset is therefore not an exclusively NATO project, but a project that is carried out partly with NATO's involvement.

18. The clandestine InfoOps and PsyOps are outgrowths of an underlying spiritual struggle. This spiritual struggle is described in the letter of the apostle Paul to the Ephesians [fn 4]:

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.

Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.

Stand therefore, having your loins girt about with truth, and having on the breastplate of righteousness;

And your feet shod with the preparation of the gospel of peace;

Above all, taking the shield of faith, wherewith ye shall be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked.

And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God.

[fn 4] Ephesians 6:12-17

19. The lie that is the preferred reality goes so far that most people are not aware that everything that the de facto power holders and their executors, including the defendants in their statements of defence, present as truth concerning the origin and functioning of Creation ('science') is deliberately mendacious and false. In reality this is a deliberate attack on the Creator and on creation (including, in particular, man himself). The ultimate aim is to eradicate root and branch the ensouled human being, made in the image of his Creator, who is in connection with his Creator.

20. In order to achieve the complete disconnection between man and his Creator (with the intended consequence of the end of the ensouled human being), a 'Great Reset' is under way in which the ensouled human being is transformed by means of a false belief in technology and technological possibilities. The Great Reset pursues a 'Human 4.0', a human being whose bodily functions and thinking (cognition) have been technically influenced to such an extent that there is no longer an ensouled human being. In the preferred reality, this Great Reset is completely denied by the de facto power holders and their executors, so that its underlying spiritual importance cannot be discussed. In the preferred reality, the changes in the field of technology are projected as 'scientific progress' that can bring people much good. In the process, the underlying intentions of these costly technological, and above all digital, developments are concealed [fn 5]. It is telling that this technology is made available to the public 'free of charge'.

21. This genocide of the ensouled human being thus takes place first of all at a spiritual level. By giving man in the preferred reality the idea that it is not the Creator (in whose image he was created) and creation that are decisive for being able to live a good life, but (compelled) participation in the preferred reality (the large-scale lie), man becomes ever more distant from his Creator and loses his or her life's animating spirit. Man thereby literally loses his or her soul. As a result, in the spiritual sense, the ensouled human being is lost, or 'broken away from God'.

22. Secondly, this genocide takes place physically, among other things by means of the Covid-19 (mRNA) injections. Through the various batches of this poison, people are weakened, made ill, altered, sterilised and/or killed, so that as human beings they cannot reach full maturity. People are also made ill through influence on (other aspects of) the living environment. In this submission the emphasis is on the toxic Covid-19 (mRNA) injections propagated by the defendants.

23. The fact that the Covid-19 injections contain mRNA technology and nanotechnology is a clear indication that the de facto power holders and their executors also want to alter man himself (his DNA) by means of mRNA and (by means of nanotechnology) want to make him part of the 'Internet of Bodies' referred to in the summons [fn 6].

[fn 5] Think in this connection also of the rise of AI technology, which citizens and entrepreneurs or their employees can use 'free of charge'. A striking similarity here is that the Covid-19 injections were also 'free of charge'.

[fn 6] [footnote text not present in the Dutch source text]

As exhibit 97, [redacted] et al. submit the WEF Briefing Paper concerning the Internet of Bodies. The spiritual aspect at play here is evident to anyone who 'is willing to see and hear': the de facto power holders thereby aim to create the situation in which man is no longer (purely) created in the image of his Creator. This means (mRNA) is deployed by the de facto power holders and their executors (partly) for the purposes of the spiritual struggle, with the aim of (by altering the DNA) drawing man completely away from his Creator. The nanotechnology serves to offer, in the preferred reality, an 'alternative' to his or her natural bond with the Creator, whereby he or she can enter into a bond with a 'new creation', namely absorption into the Internet of Bodies (part of the all-encompassing World Wide Web), by which, in the preferred reality, man is fused with technology and could thereby even become 'immortal'. In this connection the de facto power holders speak of the 'Fourth Industrial Revolution' and 'transhumanism'. The WEF also states this explicitly on its website (exhibit 98). The physical and spiritual aspects of these false promises cannot be understood separately from each other.

24. The struggle in which the de facto power holders and their executors, including the defendants, take part is therefore a struggle against the ensouled human being (including [redacted] et al.).

25. In these proceedings, the contrast between the Truth and the preferred reality manifests itself in the irreconcilable positions of the parties on what the Covid-19 injections really are. [redacted] et al. take the position that this is demonstrably and provably a bioweapon with which the de facto power holders and their executors, including the defendants, are committing genocide on, among others, the Dutch people, including [redacted] et al. The use of this bioweapon is part of the 'Great Reset' described in the summons. Against this the defendants set their own uniform narrative, namely that of the preferred reality.

26. In the context of the preferred reality, [redacted] et al. point out to your court and the parties that a petition for provisional evidentiary measures is pending before your court [fn 7], in which the defendants in these proceedings are the respondents and in which international experts have been put forward to provide evidence of the existence of the Great Reset, the bioweapon and the genocide referred to here. [redacted] et al. also offer the same expert evidence in these proceedings, with reference to chapter III and paragraph 44 of this reply. Apart from that, the assertions of [redacted] et al. concerning the Great Reset, the bioweapon and the genocide are based on valid means of evidence. Since the summons was issued, the evidence that [redacted] et al. have come to possess has only increased.

27. As a result of the increased evidence, in the period of almost two years since the summons, [redacted] et al. have gone through a further process of deepening, from which an even deeper awareness has arisen that makes them aware of, among other things, the true significance of a number of institutions that play a crucial role in the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. This concerns in particular NATO and the European Union. Because the defendants are carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, of which the Covid-19 (mRNA) injections are a crucial part, [redacted] et al. consider it of great importance to put this deepened awareness before your court and to make it part of the assertions of [redacted] et al. in these proceedings.

[fn 7] C/17/199273/HA RK 25/17. The oral hearing of this petition is scheduled for 9 July 2025 at 13.15.

28. The role of NATO with regard to information operations aimed at projecting a preferred reality onto the public has already been discussed above. It was noted there that the project Covid-19: The Great Reset is not exclusively a NATO project, but a global project carried out by (virtually) all international organisations. The European Union, of which the Netherlands is a member state, is also an important executor of this project, and it can count on the full cooperation of all the defendants. Here, too, the European Union is not what the preferred reality wants the civilian population of the Netherlands, including [redacted] et al., to believe. In this regard, the following.

29. On 14 June 2022, EU Commission President Ursula van der Leyen received a so-called 'honorary doctorate' from Ben Gurion University in Israel. In the speech she gave on that occasion, Van der Leyen declared that Europe is the values of the Talmud. For that reason, according to Van der Leyen, Europe and Israel are bound friends and allies of each other. As exhibit 99, [redacted] et al. submit a copy of the video recording of her confession during Van der Leyen's speech of 14 June 2022.

30. The meaning of Van der Leyen's statement that Europe is the value of the Talmud is not understood in the preferred reality, because most people do not know what the Talmud is and what the Talmud truly stands for. With this public confession, however, Van der Leyen spoke the whole truth about what the EU in reality stands for, namely the values of the Talmud. Because Van der Leyen declares that the values of the Talmud are the EU, it is established that the EU population, including [redacted] et al., is being deceived and has deliberately been placed in a preferred reality.

31. Before going further into the values of the Talmud/EU as described in the Talmud, [redacted] et al. first wish to draw attention to a number of examples of the 'values' propagated by the EU itself in its architecture, art, events and exhibitions.

32. The most striking and symbolic building representing the EU is the parliament building in Strasbourg. Through its architecture, this building evidently depicts the biblical Tower of Babel. Babel, located in Babylonia [fn 8], is described in the Old Testament as the place where man, by building the Tower of Babel, rose up in rebellion against his Creator. In that rebellion, mankind formed itself into one people, with one official religion and one language. Biblical history records that the Creator intervened in this malicious plan of man, as a result of which the construction of this tower was not completed. The EU parliament building in Strasbourg has the shape of the unfinished Tower of Babel and thereby symbolises a continuation of the biblical Babylon. As exhibit 100, [redacted] et al. submit a photograph of both the EU parliament building and the Tower of Babel as painted by Bruegel.

[fn 8] Biblical Babylonia comprises an area situated in the region of present-day Iraq and Syria.

33. In front of the EU building in Strasbourg, a life-size 'work of art' has been placed of a woman sitting backwards on a bull [fn 9]. This woman symbolises Princess Europa, known from Greek mythology. In mythology the bull is associated with the Greek god Zeus. In the preferred reality, this 'work of art' is explained by the myth that Zeus fell in love with Princess Europa after seeing her on the beach at Sidon [fn 10] and for that reason assumed the form of a white bull. According to the myth of the preferred reality, Zeus seduced Princess Europa into sitting on his back and then swam with her to Crete, where they are said to have had loving intercourse. This explanation/myth projected in the preferred reality, however, conceals the Truth that in mythology Zeus is equivalent to Satan, and that one must therefore speak not of loving intercourse but of the abduction and rape of Princess Europa. With this work of art, for anyone who 'is willing to see and hear', this abduction and rape of Europa is elevated to 'art'. As exhibit 101, [redacted] et al. submit a photograph of the aforementioned 'work of art' of Zeus in the form of a bull with Princess Europa on his back.

34. Another example of how the EU propagates its Talmudic values concerns the organisation of the 2024 Olympic Games in Paris. During the opening ceremony of this event, a large set was shown in which people took their places in a composition corresponding to that of Jesus Christ and his disciples in the Last Supper, which is very important to Christians. The way in which this set was formed by drag queens during the Olympic Games can, from a Christian perspective, be qualified only as extremely grave blasphemy. In this composition the person of Jesus Christ was portrayed as an unsightly dressed and made-up fat drag queen with a seven-pointed crown on his fat head. In the Bible the number seven has several meanings, among them divine completeness. Genesis, the creation story, concerns the creation of, among other things, man and woman, who were created in the image of the Creator himself. In the Bible the covenant between man and woman is a holy covenant, and man and woman are complete only within that covenant. By placing a drag queen with a seven-pointed crown in the place of Jesus Christ in the depiction of the Last Supper, the creation story, the Creator and his Son (Jesus Christ) are utterly ridiculed, and it is made explicitly clear which values contrary to the Bible the EU adheres to. During the opening ceremony it did not stop at this one very grave blasphemy. A procession by a depicted pale horse also explicitly referred to the Book of Revelation in the Bible, in which this horse is the symbol of death. In addition, use was made of the image of a golden calf as a symbol of the rejection of the Creator and an object for the worship of a false god. An explanation that convincingly shows that this cannot have been a mistake or art can be found on YouTube [fn 11], and [redacted] et al. refer to it. Here too the EU has shown the Talmudic values from which it has emerged and which govern the EU to this day. As exhibit 102, [redacted] et al. submit a photograph of part of the opening scene of the Olympic Games.

[fn 9] This scene also frequently recurs on the Greek two-euro coins.

[fn 10] An area situated in present-day southern Lebanon.

35. The examples discussed above of the Talmudic values propagated by the EU fit seamlessly with the values contained in the texts of the Babylonian Talmud. [redacted] et al. are aware that a distinction can be made between the Babylonian Talmud and the Jerusalem Talmud. Since the most striking building of the EU represents the Tower of Babel, it is clear that the President of the European Commission, Van der Leyen, who knows this building like no other, meant the Babylonian Talmud. For this reason, [redacted] et al. proceed below on the basis of the Babylonian Talmud.

36. The Talmud is the Talmudic interpretation of the Torah. The Torah, also spelled Tora or Torah, comprises the first five books of the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible), or the first five books of the Old Testament [fn 12]. In the Babylonian Talmud, 'teachers' in the Jewish faith (rabbis), on the basis of their interpretation of the Torah, set out their worldview and conviction concerning the nature of mankind. In doing so, these 'teachers' draw a strict distinction (resulting in dualism) between people of their own 'religious origin' and others. The others, including [redacted] et al., are referred to by these 'teachers' as 'Goyim' [fn 13].

37. Below, a number of positions from the Babylonian Talmud concerning the view of Goyim (including [redacted] et al.) will be set out with their source references. This is possible because the Talmud was translated for the first time from Hebrew (into Latin) by the Polish-Russian Catholic priest I.B. Pranaitis at the end of the nineteenth century. It was this priest Pranaitis who, in his book 'Christianus In Talmude Judaeorum' [fn 14] of 1892, unmasked the true intentions behind the interpretation of the aforementioned 'teachers' in the Jewish faith as an attack on Christianity. A copy of the cover of this book and a statement of where this book can be found are submitted as exhibit 103.

Goyim are not human beings (Baba Metzia, 114b)

[fn 11] https://youtu.be/scWiByscY-k?si=0gE9xYZJEnLH0NF6

[fn 12] [footnote text not present in the Dutch source text]

[fn 13] Found in the part of the Talmud under Baba Metzia, 114b.

[fn 14] Christianus in Talmude Iudaeorum. The Talmud Unmasked. The Secret Rabbinical Teachings Concerning Christians ... Translation of the Author's Latin Text, ISBN: 9781466238831, ISBN-10: 1466238836

Goyim may be put to death without punishment (Sanhedrin 57a)

Goyim are heathens and must all be killed (Soferim 15).

Sex with girls from the age of three, involving sexual intercourse, is permitted (Sanhedrin 54b and Kethuboth 11b)

It is permitted to steal from Goyim (Baba Mezia 24a)

Deceiving and lying to Goyim in order to outwit them is permitted (Baba Kamma 113a)

Jesus Christ was sexually immoral and the God he worshipped was a brick (Sanhedrin 107b)

38. The spiritual charge of these interpretations from the Talmud, taken as examples, corresponds to the spiritual charge of the way in which, in carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, mankind is murdered, robbed, sterilised and deceived. For this reason the defendants, all of whom take part in this project, are acting unlawfully. This unlawful conduct continues for as long as this project continues and the defendants do not refuse to resist the execution of this project, which is their duty to society.

39. With this introduction, [redacted] et al. (also) aim to share with the court their insights into the how and why of the extreme manipulations and deceptions that led them to have a Covid-19 injection administered, which would not have happened had the defendants not cooperated in carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset and/or had they resisted it in accordance with their duty to society. As regards those insights, [redacted] et al. cannot leave unmentioned that the malicious project Covid-19: The Great Reset, with the aim of forming a new world order (The New World Order), is symbolised by a newly introduced flag. In the preferred reality, this flag is projected as underlining the importance of equal opportunities, diversity and inclusion, and it is embraced by all institutions worldwide, including, for example, the Judiciary, the Netherlands Bar (NOvA), the Public Prosecution Service and the police. As an example of this, a photographic portrait of the members of the general council of the NOvA is submitted as exhibit 104, together with a number of other photographs in which this flag is displayed.

40. According to the projection in the preferred reality, the colours of this flag (see exhibit 104) are derived from the rainbow, which in the preferred reality also explains the name of this flag, namely the 'Rainbow flag'. The Truth, however, is that this flag has nothing to do with equal opportunities, diversity and inclusion. In reality this flag is a malicious and false interpretation of the spiritual meaning of the rainbow, which is important to Christians. This Christian meaning is explained in the biblical book of Genesis. For Christians, the rainbow is the sign given by Almighty God in confirmation of his promise that mankind will not experience another flood. The divine rainbow that every person can behold has seven colours, the most important of which is the Heavenly Light Blue, which symbolises the Kingdom of Heaven. The Rainbow flag projected onto mankind in the preferred reality consists of six instead of seven [fn 15] colours, the divine Heavenly Light Blue being deliberately absent. In a symbolic sense, therefore, it is depicted that the Tower of Babel will be completed and that the soulless human being will succeed in his rebellion against Almighty God.

41. This is what in reality is the meaning of The New World Order, which is to be brought about with a Great Reset and in the context of which the defendants are cooperating in carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

II. Deed submitting copies of vaccination certificates, amendment of claim and request for a case management hearing.

42. On the docket of 11 December 2024, [redacted] et al., by means of a deed, introduced further documents into the proceedings, increased their claim and requested a case management hearing. This deed is submitted herewith as exhibit 105. [redacted] et al. request your court to regard the content of this deed as repeated and incorporated here verbatim. Let this be recorded! [redacted] et al. assume at this stage of the proceedings that your court, too, accepts this amendment of claim as a procedural legal fact, so that the claims of [redacted] et al. read:

May it please the court, by judgment,

1. to declare that the defendants, as a group and each individually, have continued, up to the day of the final decision rendered by your court in this case, to act unlawfully towards the claimants (including an unlawful omission) by intentionally and unlawfully deceiving them and the Dutch people in order to induce the claimants and/or the Dutch people to have Covid-19 injections administered, of which the defendants knew, or at least ought to have known, that these injections are not safe and effective, or at least that the false and misleading narrative propagated by the defendants in the context of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset and/or the Covid-19 injections introduced in the context of this project are harmful to the health, fertility and mental well-being of the defendants and/or the Dutch people.

2. to order the defendants, jointly and severally, the one paying to be discharged as regards the other, and with the order declared provisionally enforceable, to compensate the claimants for their damage, to be assessed in separate follow-up proceedings for the assessment of damages (schadestaatprocedure) and settled in accordance with the law.

3. to order the defendants to pay the costs of these proceedings by way of a costs order to be pronounced by your court for that purpose, declared provisionally enforceable.

[fn 15] The number seven occurs frequently in the Bible and symbolises, among other things, divine completeness.

43. In addition to the documents submitted with the deed of 11 December 2024, [redacted] et al. hereby submit as exhibit 106 a copy of the coronavirus vaccination registration card concerning claimant 7.

III. Specific offer of evidence in relation to the petition pending before your court under reference C/17/199273 / HA RK 25/17.

44. As exhibit 107, [redacted] et al. submit a copy of the petition for provisional evidentiary measures in the case already referred to above, pending before your court under reference C/17/199273 / HA RK 25/17. [redacted] et al. fully endorse the findings and assertions of the petitioners in those proceedings, which amount to the Covid-19 (mRNA) injections being bioweapons with which genocide is being committed by the de facto power holders and their executors for the benefit of the Great Reset. In particular, it holds for [redacted] et al. too that if Covid-19 (mRNA) injections, administered under the influence of a misrepresentation deliberately given to them (a false narrative), under societal pressure caused by this false narrative and in breach of art. 7 in conjunction with art. 4(2) ICCPR, turn out not to be vaccines in the interest of public health, but turn out to have been developed as a bioweapon with the primary aim of medically harming the claimants and in fact the (world) population and of reducing human life expectancy, then only one conclusion is possible, namely that there has been the intentional commission, in an organised group, of an unlawful act against the claimants and in fact against the entire (world) population. [redacted] et al. are of the opinion that the witness/expert evidence put forward by the petitioners in those petition proceedings may not be ignored by your court in these proceedings either. [redacted] et al. expressly offer to have the international witnesses/experts put forward in the petition heard in proof of their assertion that the defendants, as executors of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, acted unlawfully (as a group) towards [redacted] et al.

IV. Response to the statement of defence of defendants 1 to 12 (the State et al.)

45. The statement of defence of the State et al. essentially amounts to a repetition of the official narrative about Covid-19, which, as a project, must be propagated uniformly worldwide by the executors of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. In no way whatsoever do the State et al. seriously address the extensive and reasoned position and evidence put forward by [redacted] et al. In their statement of defence the State et al. thus attempt to nip in the bud the procedural debate initiated by [redacted] et al., by dismissing the assertions of [redacted] et al. with the meaningless defence, by now become standard, that these are 'conspiracy theories' without any factual basis. Insofar as the State et al. rely on 'facts and circumstances', these are manipulated data compiled through bodies controlled by the State et al. themselves. All of these bodies, like the State et al., have committed themselves to the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, so that it must be assumed that these 'facts and circumstances' are nothing other than the preferred reality that the State et al., as co-executor of this project, project onto the population, including [redacted] et al. For this reason the evidential value of the facts and circumstances or data put forward by the State et al. must be regarded as nil; in reality this is the 'telefast reality' identified by Major General (retired) Van Kappen.

46. The State et al. open their statement of defence with the opening sentence: 'the Covid-19 pandemic was an eventful period in which various, sometimes drastic, measures were necessary to protect public health and society'. This is demonstrably an utterly criminal, mendacious assertion, which the State et al. are compelled to make because projecting precisely this preferred reality is a necessity for being able to continue carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. The Truth is that there was nothing other than a 'political pandemic narrative', planned and carried out globally with malicious intent. This without any medical cause and with the aim of making as many people as possible worldwide 'willing to be vaccinated', in order then to kill, injure and sterilise them with toxic Covid-19 mRNA injections. All this with the ultimate aim of placing mankind, by way of a Great Reset, in the reality of the New World Order.

47. The conclusive proof that, in the sense referred to above, there was merely a 'political pandemic narrative' - a PsyOP - is to be found in the German internal COVID-19 crisis team protocols (Interne COVID-19-Krisenstabs-Protokolle) of the Robert Koch Institute. More specifically, these are minutes of meetings of the RKI-Krisenstab, supplementary information and email correspondence. The RKI-Krisenstab is essentially the same as the Dutch Outbreak Management Team and fulfilled exactly the same role in the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. This information entered the public domain uncensored [fn 16] thanks to the courageous efforts of, among others, the Berlin journalist Aya Velázquez [fn 17]. This information comprises tens of gigabytes and was explained at a press conference on 23 July 2024 by Prof. Dr. Stefan Homburg [fn 18], Aya Velázquez and Bastian Barucker [fn 19]. The minutes of the RKI-Krisenstab are submitted as exhibit 108. For the complete information, including a video of the press conference, the supplementary material, the email correspondence and the RKI minutes, reference is made to the website https://rki-transparenzbericht.de/, where all of these can be freely viewed and downloaded. Because of the volume of these documents, [redacted] et al. trust that your court and the parties agree to these documents, including the video of the press conference, being introduced into the proceedings via this link, so that they form part of the case file. As exhibit 109, a screenshot is submitted of the aforementioned website on the internet domain rki-transparenzbericht.de.

[fn 16] The German independent journalist Paul Schreyer, born in 1977, had already made great efforts to this end earlier and succeeded in obtaining the RKI minutes through legal channels, but these were heavily censored printouts of the minutes, because large parts of the text had been blacked out.

[fn 17] Aya Velázquez is a pseudonym of the brilliant publicist Magdalena Jany, born in 1986.

[fn 18] Professor Emeritus Stefan Homburg (born on 10 March 1961) is a retired German professor of economics. Until his early retirement in 2021 he was director of the Institute of Public Finance at the Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover in Lower Saxony, Germany.

[fn 19] Mr Barucker devotes himself to wilderness education, emotional and body work and genuinely independent journalism, and publishes, among other places, on his website https://bastian-barucker.de/

48. The RKI-Krisenstab minutes show that the RKI-Krisenstab was initially taken completely by surprise by the fact that, without any medical cause, politicians were talking about a pandemic and the need for far-reaching measures in that connection. The internal finding of the RKI was therefore that there was no pandemic. In carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, however, so much pressure was put on the RKI-Krisenstab that what the RKI-Krisenstab made public in the form of recommendations was contrary to its own findings, namely that there was no reason for any measure whatsoever. In this way the RKI-Krisenstab and its staff became, against their will, executors of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. This course of events was exactly the same in the Netherlands, more particularly within the Dutch OMT. The latter explains why former Minister Ernst Kuipers, in his decision of 17 March 2023 on a Woo (Open Government Act) request to that effect, refused to disclose the transcripts of the audio recordings of the OMT meetings in the period June 2020 up to and including March 2021 (exhibit 110).

49. The situation of the non-existent pandemic was explained crystal clearly by Professor Doctor Emeritus Stefan Homburg at the aforementioned press conference. The video of this press conference is submitted as exhibit 111.

50. Following the release of the RKI documents, the German Doctor (med.) Bodo Schiffmann [fn 20] wrote the book 'Die RKI-Files Das ENT-SCHWÄRZTE VERBRECHEN, was die Menschen in der "Pandemie" nicht wissen sollten'. In this book the RKI minutes are quoted and explained. A copy of this book is submitted as exhibit 112. On the basis of the RKI minutes, this book sets out:

• That the RKI already recognised on 19 March 2021 that fewer people die of 'corona' than of the flu and that the Covid-19 injections have no positive effects (page 5);

• That the RKI, by a protocol of 24 March 2020, enforced that, in the cremation of human remains, the use of a second coroner to establish the (actual) cause of death be dispensed with, and that as early as 31 March 2020 it was clear to the RKI that wearing face masks offers no protection against 'corona infections' (page 26);

• That patients in hospitals and people in care homes for the elderly were murdered by emergency services on the orders of the German State (page 194);

• That politicians paid no heed whatsoever to the RKI and its findings (page 196);

• That the RKI internally assessed the situation as not dangerous, but decided that this finding must not be communicated to the public (page 9);

• That the RKI wondered what the danger of this 'pandemic' actually was (page 23);

[fn 20] Until the roll-out of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, Doctor (med.) Bodo Schiffmann was an internationally recognised expert, much sought after in the media, in the field of vertigo disorders, ENT and emergency medicine.

• That every deceased person was registered as a 'corona death' if, while alive, he or she had ever had even a single positive PCR test result, so as to inflate the numbers of 'corona deaths' (page 102);

• That the RKI was instructed by the Ministry of Health (BMG) to draw up a document in case the BMG were to become the subject of an investigation (page 103);

• That the numbers of available ICU beds were tampered with and that the RKI knew this (page 131);

• That the RKI engaged in 'Inside Trading', i.e. insider dealing (page 138);

• That the RKI feared a relaxation of measures because its own criminal role might thereby come to light (page 148);

• That the RKI prescribed that one should no longer speak of a PCR test but choose a different name for that same test, because it knew that no conclusions can be drawn from a PCR test about the presence of 'viruses' (page 156);

• That on 3 February 2021 it was already entirely clear from the figures that people were not dying of 'Covid-19' but of the toxic Covid-19 mRNA injections (page 170);

• That the RKI assumed that with the use of Covid-19 mRNA injections deaths attributable to them had to be reckoned with in any event (page 176);

• That the RKI recognised that the main risk of dying of 'Covid-19' was old age, exactly as with the flu, and that people of advanced age were not protected against it by the Covid-19 mRNA injections (page 177);

• That four months after the start of the Covid-19 injection campaign, sudden unexpected deaths and hospital admissions increased sharply (page 183).

51. The uncensored RKI data permit no other conclusion than that this is a maliciously devised global project - Covid-19: The Great Reset - that is being rolled out everywhere, including in the Netherlands, according to the same script. For anyone who is willing to see and hear, it is clear that the official narrative is a farce. Now that more than five years have passed, no SarsCov2 virus has to date ever been isolated, nor has it been demonstrated by the so-called scientific gold standard that people would contract the pretended disease Covid-19 through infection with this non-existent virus. Anyone who is willing to see and hear observes and acknowledges that, after the large-scale Covid-19 injection campaign, general public health has deteriorated considerably and many more people are dying than before this Covid-19 injection campaign. The effects of this manifest themselves, among other things, in an enormous increase in all kinds of serious diseases, such as turbo cancers, cardiovascular diseases, diabetes and sudden death, mostly of people in the prime of their lives. The Truth is that the State et al.'s denial of all this is entirely part of the official narrative and of the preferred reality projected in that context.

52. The information projected by the State et al. in the preferred reality concerning the 'side effects of the Covid-19 vaccines' rests on a very great many manipulations. In this connection [redacted] et al. point to the following. For the purposes of the statistical research, as it takes place in the preferred reality, into the side effects of the falsely so-called 'Covid-19 vaccines', the lie is used that in the first two weeks after the injection concerned has been administered the 'vaccine' would not be active and would therefore also have no 'side effects'. For this reason, people into whom this poison was injected were registered in the preferred reality as 'unvaccinated' during the first two weeks after injection. The RKI documents discussed above show how malicious this immense manipulation is; through it the State et al. literally walk over dead bodies.

53. [redacted] et al. are aware of several highly renowned medical scientists who, with hard research results, have seen through the preferred reality described above.

54. In 2022 a German team of pathologists, including Doctor (med.) Ute Krüger and Professor Doctor (med.) Walter Lang, on the initiative of the research leader Professor Doctor (med.) Arne Burkhardt† and Rechtsanwalt Mag. Elmar Becker, began an extensive scientific pathological study. This study was completed in June 2023. The study focused on tissue from 89 deceased patients and biopsies from 75 living patients. All these patients had (while alive) been injected with one or more Covid-19 mRNA injections. The study demonstrates, scientifically and peer reviewed, that in 77% of cases the COVID-19 mRNA injection is the cause of death or the cause of their illness.

55. Prof. Doctor med. Arne Burkhardt died in the very final phase of this study, on 30 May 2023, in undisclosed circumstances on Lake Constance (Bodensee) in Germany, before he had had the opportunity to publish the results of his study. Burkhardt also intended to present the research results publicly at a pathology conference, which, because of his death, he was no longer able to do. Posthumously, the peer reviewed research results were nevertheless published on 4 September 2024 by Doctor (med.) Ute Krüger and Professor Doctor (med.) Walter Lang under the title 'vaccinated-dead' [fn 21]. A copy of this book is submitted as exhibit 113 (to follow via UT).

56. At an earlier pathology conference in Germany, Prof. Burkhardt, on the basis of his professional findings, including with regard to the tissue damage he had observed in the testicles of men injected with Covid-19 mRNA, issued urgent warnings about the consequences for their health, fertility and life expectancy. A video of this warning by Prof. Burkhardt is submitted as exhibit 114.

57. The de facto power holders and their executors, including the State et al., have done everything, in carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, to undermine the findings and warnings of Prof. Burkhardt by means of InfoOps and PsyOps.

[fn 21] ISBN-13:978-90-835259-5-2, publisher Corage Media; Martin Z. Schröder Verlag

58. Not only in Germany but also in the United States of America, a renowned medical scientist has stood up and taken the initiative to set up a large-scale peer reviewed study of people who died after having a Covid-19 mRNA injection administered. The initiator of this is Doctor (med.) Peter Andrew McCullough [fn 22]. The study is based on peer-reviewed autopsy studies of 325 people who, shortly before their sudden death, had had one or more Covid-19 injections administered. Of these 325 deaths, it was established that 73.9% of them died as a result of the Covid-19 injections, which thus demonstrated the causal link between these deaths and the administration of the Covid-19 injections. This peer-reviewed study, which could only be published after years of censorship, on 17 November 2024, in a scientific edition of the medical journal 'Science, Public Health Policy and the Law', is submitted as exhibit 115.

59. On 8 February 2025, Doctor (med.) Peter Andrew McCullough published a further important peer-reviewed autopsy study. This study is of particular importance for unmasking one important lie that was projected in the preferred reality with regard to Covid-19 mRNA injections. [redacted] et al. refer here to the lie that the mRNA in the Covid-19 mRNA injection - which, according to the WHO protocol [fn 23], is administered in the deltoid muscle of the upper arm - would remain in the deltoid muscle of the upper arm for only a short time because this mRNA would be broken down again by the body on the spot. The autopsy study proves that this claim - which played a major role in the so-called willingness of people, including [redacted] et al., to be vaccinated - is a complete lie, because the spike proteins are expressed in all parts of the body and this process demonstrably continued undiminished even 555 days after the injection was administered, in the heart of the deceased patient examined in this study. As exhibit 116, [redacted] et al. submit the peer-reviewed autopsy study of Doctor (med.) Peter Andrew McCullough of 8 February 2025.

60. Doctor Ute Krüger, the anatomical pathologist associated with the team of Prof. Burkhardt† referred to above, reported on 2 October 2024, in a scientific contribution in the Berliner Zeitung, on her professional observation that from autumn 2021 onwards the number of cases of fast-growing cancers in the breasts of women aged between 30 and 50 who had been injected with Covid-19 mRNA injections rose sharply. She observed that the cancerous tumours deviated from what she had seen and experienced in her career of many years. The contribution concerned also discusses other studies, from which it follows, among other things, that 30 per cent of deaths within two weeks of having a Covid-19 mRNA injection administered are causally attributable to the Covid-19 mRNA injection, and that the increase in serious autoimmune diseases is also caused by the Covid-19 mRNA injections. A copy of this contribution in the Berliner Zeitung of 2 October 2024 is submitted as exhibit 117.

[fn 22] Doctor (med.) Peter Andrew McCullough (born on 29 December 1962) is a former American cardiologist. He was vice chief of internal medicine at Baylor University Medical Center and a professor at Texas A&M University.

[fn 23] The WHO protocol on administering the toxic Covid-19 injections prescribes that the check by the person administering the injection as to whether a blood vessel has been hit with the needle of the syringe is to be omitted. This with the risk that the Covid-19 mRNA injection fluid was injected directly into the bloodstream, as a result of which it could not in any event remain in the deltoid muscle.

61. In carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, a number of the executors, in their total arrogance and hubris, have made extremely large blunders. A striking example of this is the public confession made by the CEO of Moderna on the occasion of a WEF panel discussion in Davos, Switzerland, in 2023. He stated that in 2019 Moderna had a production capacity of only 100,000 vials of Covid-19 mRNA injection fluid and that already in that same year, 2019, he gave Moderna the instruction to scale up production from one hundred thousand to one billion vials in 2020. When the production department of Moderna asked what that would be needed for, the CEO answered that it was necessary because he knew that a pandemic was planned for 2020. The video of the WEF meeting at which Stephane Bancel, the CEO of Moderna, made this public confession is submitted as exhibit 118.

Excess mortality

62. At paragraph 2.7 the State et al. address the assertions of [redacted] et al. concerning excess mortality. [redacted] et al. respond to this as follows. As indicated above, the facts, circumstances and data presented by the State et al. are derived from the preferred reality (CBS and RIVM) and for that reason cannot serve for a purely scientific debate on what exactly the excess mortality is. What is demonstrable is that the concept of excess mortality is not a fixed arithmetical criterion, but a figure that merely expresses how the registered numbers of deaths relate to an earlier forecast of them. In the method used by the State et al., the forecast of mortality is therefore decisive for the question of whether there is excess mortality. Because the State et al. also determine this forecast using varying definitions and calculation methods, the positions taken by the State et al. on excess mortality make no sense whatsoever.

63. A number of independent experts, including Prof. Dr. Ronald Meester and drs. Herman Steigstra, who are eminently suitable and willing and have the knowledge and resources to carry out a scientifically substantiated study of excess mortality on the basis of pure, unprocessed data, have offered to carry out this study. The State et al., or Lareb respectively, have refused to make the data available for such a study. This proves that the State et al. are doing everything to prevent the assertion projected in the preferred reality - that there was excess mortality during the so-called corona pandemic and not, or hardly, thereafter - from being refuted on the basis of thorough research. As exhibit 119, [redacted] et al. submit a printout of a post on the platform X by a member of the House of Representatives of 21 May 2025, which shows this.

64. That this excess mortality exists was set out by [redacted] et al. in the summons on the basis of data that are as objective as possible. The finding that there is a great deal of excess mortality is entirely in line with the factual observation of [redacted] et al. and many others that the numbers of sudden deaths and serious illnesses - in particular among people who have taken a Covid-19 injection - have increased sharply.

65. Furthermore, [redacted] et al. note that crystallising exactly what the excess mortality is, is not crucial for the present proceedings, in which answering the question whether the Covid-19 mRNA injection is a 'vaccine' or a 'bioweapon' is of crucial importance, so that the procedural debate ought to focus on this. After all, if the defendants made possible the administration of a bioweapon, their liability and the damage are established, and the causal link between damage and unlawful act is also given. Against this background, the offer of evidence made in chapter III of this submission is of great importance.

Authorisation and marketing authorisation

66. At paragraph 5.1 of the statement of defence, the State et al. address the development of the Covid-19 mRNA injections. This account is diametrically opposed to the assertions of [redacted] et al. in the summons, from which it follows that there was no medical pandemic, as the RKI minutes, among other things, demonstrate.

67. The question whether a validly granted marketing authorisation was issued by the EMA is not of decisive importance for the question whether the State et al. acted unlawfully. It should be clear that [redacted] et al. have argued, with substantiation and with evidence, that the so-called pandemic was projected onto the civilian population only in the preferred reality, so that a formally granted marketing authorisation carries no weight in assessing the unlawfulness of the acts and omissions of the State et al. In addition - and for this the specific offer of evidence made in chapter III of this submission is of importance - American regulations proceed from the assumption that a 'vaccine' by definition causes harm to public health, and under American medical law there is no precautionary principle to protect people against 'vaccine injury'. Furthermore, it can be demonstrated that under American law it was permitted, in the production of the Covid-19 mRNA injections, to have up to 50% DNA scrap instead of mRNA as contamination in the injection fluid. This was permitted because during production large quantities of DNA scrap were measured in the mRNA injection fluid produced and there were no technical means of preventing that in large-scale production. Nota bene: the production process of Covid-19 mRNA injections is the same everywhere in the world.

68. The international experts put forward, Katherine Watt and Sasha Latypova, know all the released American documents and regulations on this matter like no one else, and stand ready to give your court a full explanation of this point under oath, fully substantiated on the basis of official papers and documents, and also to report, as witnesses from their own direct observation, on the course of events surrounding production and the granting of the American and European authorisations.

69. Another very weighty reason why the formal marketing authorisation is not of decisive significance is the fact that it follows from the registration of data in VAERS and other systems that there are enormously large differences in 'side effects of different batches of Covid-19 injections [fn 24]'. This means that the different batches cannot be regarded as the same product. It follows inevitably that the marketing authorisation does not relate to the different batches of Covid-19 mRNA injections that were administered.

Unlawful conduct

70. The assertions of the State et al. at paragraph 6.1 et seq. are a repetition of the official narrative as it is projected in the preferred reality in carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. At a time when there are by now countless victims who have lost their health and/or their lives as a result of having Covid-19 mRNA injections administered, the State et al. persist in propagating this false narrative. The core of the justification in this narrative is that there was a globally serious pandemic caused by a new Sars-Cov2 virus that would cause the new disease Covid-19.

71. The RKI files, which as if by a divine miracle escaped global censorship, show that there was never a medical pandemic. Against that background it should come as no surprise that the Sars-Cov2 virus, too, has nowhere in the world been isolated from a human being and identified according to the gold standard as a pathogen that causes the pretended disease Covid-19 in humans. In other words: the Truth is that there is no objective evidence whatsoever for the narrative of the State et al., and all the data on which they rely were fabricated in the preferred reality by means of large-scale manipulation in carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

72. For anyone who is willing to see and hear, it should be clear that if there had really been a pandemic, the large-scale deployment of media, influencers, police, 'Romeos' and the justice system would not have been necessary to make the population aware of risks to their health.

73. In view of the foregoing, the State et al. knew, or at least ought to have known, that there was no medical pandemic and that their measures taken against the population, including [redacted] et al., on the basis of the non-existent pandemic are by definition unlawful. Those measures - including lockdowns, compulsory face masks, a curfew, compulsory social distancing, bans on visits and the stepping up of social pressure to have a toxic mRNA injection administered - infringed the most fundamental and inviolable rights of the population (including article 7 ICCPR) to a far-reaching extent, without there being any possible justification for this in law.

[fn 24] In reality: bioweapons

74. The summons and the facts, arguments and evidence put forward in this statement of defence [sic] demonstrate that everything the State et al. put forward is done in carrying out the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, and that the claims of the claimants are ready to be granted, now that it is established that the defendants, despite all the evidence produced in the summons and now in [this] defence, disregard their unlawful conduct and ruthlessly push through the project Covid-19: The Great Reset entrusted to them. Only in this connection can [redacted] et al. explain that on 2 June 2025 Agema did not answer questions put by members of the House of Representatives on 29 January 2025 concerning the arrangements made with NATO. Telling in this regard is that, in response to the questions of the members of the House of Representatives, Agema reported on 18 February 2025 that she regretted being unable to answer the questions within the usual time limit. The parliamentary papers concerning these parliamentary questions are submitted as exhibit 120.

Graphene oxide

75. At paragraph 6.3 of the statement of defence, the State et al. dispute the presence of graphene oxide in the Covid-19 mRNA injections.

76. In the summons, [redacted] et al. demonstrated, on the basis of the package leaflet of a manufacturer of Covid-19 mRNA injection fluid (Pfizer), that the manufacturer itself states in the package leaflet that the injection fluid contains main ingredients with the code names ALC-0315 and ALC-0159. These code names are explained by nothing other than the Chinese patent submitted by [redacted] et al. as exhibit 43. The conclusions (claims) of this patent describe that graphene oxide in the injection fluid serves as a carrier for the nano lipid particles (NLPs) in which the mRNA is contained.

77. These NLPs are produced and sold under these code names by, among others, the company Sinopeg in China, which offers them for sale for scientific research purposes under precisely these code names and states explicitly on its website that these NLPs contain graphene oxide. As exhibit 121, [redacted] et al. submit information concerning Sinopeg that shows this, as well as information concerning possible applications of graphene oxide described in patents, literature and on the internet.

78. In the opinion of [redacted] et al., this demonstrates entirely clearly that, according to the manufacturer's own statement, the Covid-19 mRNA injections contain graphene oxide as a main ingredient. That the CBG (Medicines Evaluation Board), fact-checkers and other executors of the Covid-19 project in the preferred reality deny the presence of graphene oxide against their better knowledge is evidently done for strategic reasons. The mere concealment of the presence of graphene oxide, which is toxic to humans, in the Covid-19 mRNA injections makes it clear that this is in fact a bioweapon with which genocide is being committed. Damage, unlawful conduct, causal link and attribution, as the legal conditions for the liability of the State et al., are thereby already established.

Pfizer report

79. At paragraph 6.4 of the statement of defence, the State et al. address the Pfizer report. This report is based on 'cases of Adverse Events' from the period from 1 December 2020 to 28 February 2021. These cases were supplied to Pfizer by various third parties and selected, under conditions set by Pfizer, for inclusion in the research database that Pfizer used for this report. One of the conditions for the selection of cases was 'a complete workflow cycle'. This methodology is clearly described on pages 5 and 6 of the report. The Pfizer report was introduced into the proceedings as exhibit 40 to the summons.

80. It follows from the foregoing that the research database by no means contains all registered cases. The number of vials therefore has no significance for this study. Nor is this asserted in Pfizer's report. The numbers of doses or vials have indeed been blacked out in the version available to [redacted] et al., but not by [redacted] et al. The State et al. undoubtedly have a copy that does show this number. [redacted] et al. request your court to order the State et al. to introduce an unredacted page 6 of this report into the proceedings.

81. What matters is that the examination of the 42,086 cases studied showed that 1,223 people had died from the Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA injection within a short period, that 11,361 people had suffered Adverse Events within the aforementioned short period (and had still not recovered from them when the report was issued), and that 520 people had (already at that time) suffered irreparable harm from Pfizer's mRNA injections. In short, it is established that the Pfizer mRNA injections are dangerous and deadly and therefore anything but 'safe and effective'. Had the State et al. - which had this information at its disposal - not kept these more than one thousand deaths and thousands of injection victims under wraps, [redacted] et al. would not have had a Covid-19 injection administered. Furthermore, on page 9 of the report, under 'missing information', it can be read that the 'vaccine Effectiveness' is unknown. Against the deadly risks there was therefore, according to this report, an unknown 'effectiveness'. It follows that under no circumstances could there be any talk of 'safe and effective'.

82. In the context of not being 'safe and effective', [redacted] et al. also refer to appendix I of the report, which contains nine pages full of life-threatening 'Adverse Events Of Special Interest (AESIs)' that would make anyone shudder and would, without any doubt, have removed all 'willingness to be vaccinated' on the part of [redacted] et al. had they known of them.

83. The concealment, censoring and ridiculing of thousands of 'cases' concerning people who lost their lives or their health to a product that, as this report shows, was wrongly promoted as 'safe en effective' with the false slogan 'je doet het voor een ander' ('you are doing it for someone else') indicates that this is in fact a bioweapon with which genocide is being committed. Damage, unlawful conduct, causal link and attribution, as the legal conditions for the liability of the State et al., are thereby already established.

84. In the meantime, a former employee of the Ministry of Defence of the United Kingdom, Mr Nick Hunt, has, by legal means, compelled Pfizer to release a further report that it also wished to withhold. This report is dated 12 March 2024 and is submitted as exhibit 122. In this report Pfizer examined a limited number of AESIs, chiefly heart-related AESIs. The increased risks are expressed in this report as a so-called Hazard Ratio (HR). This Hazard Ratio expresses how much greater the likelihood of the AESI concerned is as a result of the Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA injection. A Hazard Ratio (HR) of 1.3, for example, means a 30% greater likelihood of the AESI concerned. The report further gives, for each AESI concerned, a Confidence Interval (CI) relating to the HR established. This expresses that it is 95% certain that the actual true HR lies within the stated interval of HRs. It must be inferred from this report that anyone who took a Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA injection consequently has up to a 40% greater likelihood of the AESIs concerned occurring. By way of further explanation, [redacted] et al. submit as exhibit 123 an article from the Daily Sceptic dated 8 October 2024 containing a contribution on this subject by the aforementioned Mr Nick Hunt.

85. It follows from the foregoing that [redacted] et al. rightly relied on the Pfizer report and that the (final) conclusions they drew from it are entirely correct.

Aarhus Convention

86. The contention of [redacted] et al. that the Aarhus Convention was wrongly not applied is correct regardless of which Covid-19 injection [redacted] et al. received. The fact that the Dutch population was denied the legal protection guaranteed as a fundamental right by this convention, without any medical cause (no pandemic), renders the conduct of the State et al. unlawful.

Excesses

87. At paragraph 6.6 of its statement of defence the State et al. addresses the disgusting excesses raised by [redacted] et al. that were broadcast via the public state broadcaster fully controlled by the State et al. These excesses occurred in the context of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset and served the aim the State et al. pursued in it, namely coercing people into receiving a life-threatening Covid-19 injection and splitting the Dutch civilian population, including [redacted] et al., into two camps. Since the State et al., as implementers of the Covid-19 project, had it in their power to prevent these excesses and deliberately failed to do so, the unlawfulness of these excesses is established and they must also be attributed to the State et al.

Individual allegations against natural persons

88. All defendants have in common that they implemented the project Covid-19: The Great Reset and failed to protect the Dutch population against this attack, in which fundamental rights were violated, material and non-material damage was inflicted and a bioweapon is being deployed. The unlawfulness of their conduct is established because that omission alone is contrary to the duty of care in society incumbent on them in view of their office and position in society. All contentions in the summons concerning the individual defendants are maintained and have been explained in detail by [redacted] et al. in this reply. In addition, [redacted] et al. make a number of specific observations.

Hofstra

89. As a GGD [Municipal Health Service] doctor and OMT member, Hofstra publicly defended the false Covid-19 narrative and propagated it, for example, through regular appearances on TV programmes of Omrop Fryslân. He did so while, as an OMT member, he had at least the same knowledge as follows from the RKI files and autopsy reports discussed above. As exhibit 124, [redacted] et al. submit an example of an appearance by Hofstra on Omrop Fryslân dated 4 November 2020, in which Hofstra publicly proclaims, among other things, that stricter measures were needed quickly, as well as an appearance by Hofstra on RondOm Drachten in which he further propagates the false Covid-19 narrative.

Van Dissel

90. As an OMT member, Van Dissel publicly defended the false Covid-19 narrative and propagated it, for example, through regular appearances on TV programmes and at press conferences, while, as OMT chairman, he had at least the same knowledge as follows from the RKI files and autopsy reports discussed above.

Koopmans

91. As an OMT member, Koopmans publicly defended the false Covid-19 narrative and propagated it, for example, through regular appearances on TV programmes, while, as an OMT member, she had at least the same knowledge as follows from the RKI files and autopsy reports discussed above.

Rutte

92. As Prime Minister, Rutte publicly defended the false Covid-19 narrative and propagated it, for example, through regular appearances on TV programmes and at press conferences, while, as Prime Minister, he had at least the same knowledge as follows from the RKI files and autopsy reports discussed above.

93. Rutte, an implementer of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, has recently risen to become the face of NATO and is thereby responsible within that organisation for the information operations and psyops by which the Western world is being utterly ruined, with The New World Order as the ultimate aim. The continuation of his unlawful conduct is evident.

Kaag

94. In view of her office, position in society and responsibility, Kaag’s bare denials cannot be taken seriously. Kaag is evidently an implementer of the global project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

De Jonge

95. As regards De Jonge, [redacted] et al. further point out that before De Jonge unleashed his propaganda for the Janssen Covid-19 injection on the Dutch population, he had already been informed by the RIVM by email dated 14 June 2021 of the serious effects of this product on the health of young people. Nevertheless he continued his propaganda ‘Dansen met Janssen’ [‘Dancing with Janssen’] and ‘Sjansen met Janssen’ [‘Flirting with Janssen’] for the Janssen Covid-19 injection. This reveals the malicious intent of this implementer of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. These videos are part of NATO’s psyops and InfoOps. A copy of the email from VWS [Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sport] dated 14 April 2021 together with three videos concerning De Jonge’s propaganda referred to here are submitted as exhibit 125.

Kuipers

96. As regards Kuipers, it applies in particular that he is the person who, knowing the contents of the RKI files, did everything in his power to prevent such information from being released in the Netherlands, which could jeopardise the implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. The malicious intent of Kuipers as an implementer of this project resonates in this. As regards Kuipers’ systematic violations of information rights, [redacted] et al. submit as exhibit 126 an article from de Volkskrant dated 21 November 2023. In this connection reference is also made to exhibit 109, already submitted, in which Kuipers refused to disclose information in the words: ‘I refuse disclosure of the OMT documentation you requested, including the audio recordings, transcripts and an overview of the other OMT minutes’.

97. As [redacted] et al. understand it, the District Court of North Holland, Haarlem location, following the aforementioned refusal, in proceedings brought by a political party as petitioner, ordered the Ministry of VWS to deposit 29 OMT recordings with the registry of that court. [redacted] et al. request your court to order the State to consent to these OMT recordings being introduced in these proceedings.

Gommers

98. Gommers very clearly took part in a NATO-led PsyOp to eliminate healthcare staff by means of toxic Covid-19 injections, with the aim of putting further pressure on healthcare capacity so that a pandemic could be projected in the preferred reality.

99. Gommers, who knew everything about the Pfizer trials, the RKI documents, the pathological examinations etc., must be held responsible for the death of [claimant 7], who lost her life as one of the first healthcare workers to be killed by toxic Covid-19 injections under the influence of the PsyOp carried out by Gommers.

100. Lizette Verhoeven from Eindhoven gave an account of the workings of the PsyOp of which Gommers is a co-implementer. In full confidence she received a Covid-19 Astra Ze Neca injection because she knew no better than that it was safe. Shortly after the injection she suffered a cerebral haemorrhage. From her bed she heard Gommers on TV, with complete conviction, praising the injections that had almost cost her her life as ‘safe’. Ongehoord Nederland reported on this in a TV broadcast. As exhibit 127, [redacted] et al. submit the video of Ongehoord Nederland dated 15 September 2023.

101. [redacted] et al. regard the Latin meaning of the name Astra Ze Neca as clear evidence that the toxic Covid-19 injections sold under its name were specially produced for the purposes of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. In that project Astra Ze Neca, with its most deadly injections, was The Star of Death. As exhibit 128, [redacted] et al. submit a Google translation of the name Astra Ze Neca, which, translated from Latin into Dutch, means ‘De Ster van de Dood’ [‘The Star of Death’], together with information about Astra Ze Neca as a member of the WEF.

Hoekstra

102. Hoekstra acknowledges being a member of the WEF and acknowledges that he did not oppose (‘no unconditional commitment’) the implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, and in his statement of defence he shows himself to be entirely familiar with the content of this project. Hoekstra is absorbed in his new office as European Commissioner charged with the PsyOp of the ‘Green Conversion’. This is part of the StratCom information operations and PsyOps in the field of climate in implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. Hoekstra is thereby continuing undiminished in his role as co-implementer of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, albeit from a different subject area.

103. That Hoekstra is a ruthless implementer of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset is shown by the apparent ease with which positions defended for years are exchanged for new positions – as long as those new positions serve the strategic interest of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. For example, at a hearing on 6 October 2023 in connection with his appointment as European Commissioner, Hoekstra presented himself as the great changer of his party when it came to the conversion to ‘Green’, only to state a little later, on or around 16 October 2023, that he plays only a modest role in his party – this while he was the parliamentary leader and lead candidate of his party.

104. As applies to all defendants, Hoekstra too, in view of his positions, is aware of everything: the RKI files, the autopsy reports, the Pfizer studies, the instruction to Hugo de Jonge to eliminate healthcare staff and to enforce the highest possible ‘willingness to be vaccinated’, the non-existence of a medical pandemic etc. The position that he did not know about this cannot avail him, for his little skirt blows whichever way the wind blows.

Van Nieuwenhuizen

105. As regards Van Nieuwenhuizen, it applies that she, like all defendants, is aware of everything: the RKI files, the autopsy reports, the Pfizer studies, the instruction to Hugo de Jonge to eliminate healthcare staff and to enforce the highest possible ‘willingness to be vaccinated’, the non-existence of a medical pandemic etc.

106. In view of her position, Van Nieuwenhuizen ought not to have failed to protect the citizens of the Netherlands against the implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. The fact that she failed to do so and also completely hollowed out the legal protection that the Aarhus Convention could have offered makes her, as a co-implementer of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, liable towards [redacted] et al. Van Nieuwenhuizen is continuing this project in her new office as chair of Energie-Nederland, the trade association of energy companies. In this office she is charged with the part of the StratCom information operations and PsyOps in the field of climate in implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

Sijbesma

107. As applies to all defendants, Sijbesma too, in view of his positions, is aware of everything: the RKI files, the autopsy reports, the Pfizer studies, the instruction to Hugo de Jonge to eliminate healthcare staff and to enforce the highest possible ‘willingness to be vaccinated’, the non-existence of a medical pandemic etc. That Sijbesma did not know what he was doing is utter nonsense.

108. Sijbesma pretends not to have understood that the claims of the claimants concern the material and non-material damage the claimants suffer because they were placed by the defendants, including Sijbesma, in a preferred reality and, in that preferred reality, suffered under wholly unnecessary measures. Setting up that preferred reality is precisely what Sijbesma did by, among other things, setting up the test lanes and mediating in the purchase of Covid-19 injections. The same applies to the Buitenhof broadcast in which, in front of students, he waves his measuring stick to keep the one-and-a-half-metre distance from one’s fellow human being prescribed in the preferred reality.

109. Sijbesma, with his many incompatible positions and interests, simply denies every conflict of interest. A clear example of an enormous conflict of interest involving large amounts of public money is connected with the fact that Hans Sijbesma, Sijbesma’s brother, is a director at Astra Ze Neca. Astra

Ze Neca, like Sijbesma, is a prominent member of the WEF (see exhibit 128). Regarding his contacts with his brother, Sijbesma stated on 8 June 2020 that he ‘knows well and has been in contact with’ the director and chairman of Astra Ze Neca. Sijbesma further stated on this that during these contacts with Astra Ze Neca he expressed the interest that the State and other countries have in evaluating whether they might want to consider a deal with Astra Ze Neca. The State subsequently made its first purchase of Covid-19 injections from Astra Ze Neca for an amount of 700 million euros. A clearer conflict of interest is hardly conceivable. As exhibit 129, [redacted] et al. submit information concerning the purchase from Astra Ze Neca.

110. In August 2020 the State et al. formally declared that Sijbesma performs his work as special envoy entirely without remuneration. In response, Sijbesma stated, among other things, that in the national interest he is glad to contribute non-binding advice and to share his insights into relevant developments concerning vaccines. Both statements are therefore projections in the preferred reality and show that the State and Sijbesma are jointly implementing the project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

111. In the preferred reality Sijbesma offered his services to the cabinet without remuneration. The Truth, however, is that all parties are taking part in the psyops and information operations required for the implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. In this project Sijbesma, in view of his managerial experience in industry, his loyalty to the WEF and for his important role in the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, was brought in as a fixer. To enable Sijbesma to fulfil this role as fixer and to be able to have contact with all parties for that purpose, he was given, in the preferred reality, the cover of special corona envoy.

112. Incidentally, shortly before the introduction of the official Covid-19 narrative that Covid-19 is a disease that arose from the Sars-Cov2 virus, which passed from a bat to a human at an animal market in Wuhan, Sijbesma joined the board of trustees of the WEF on 23 August 2019, with the task of overseeing the mission and values of the WEF. Half a year later, in March 2020, he took up office as ‘special corona envoy’ and did exactly what the WEF expected of him.

113. Sijbesma, meanwhile in the preferred reality also a man of the ‘climate’, is continuing undiminished with implementing the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. As applies to all defendants, Sijbesma too is accused of an unlawful omission to oppose the implementation of this project.

Causal connection

114. The causal connection between the material and non-material damage of the claimants and the group liability for co-implementing the project Covid-19: The Great Reset is present because, without cooperation in the implementation of this project (in the Netherlands), the claimants would not have had to undergo any measures and would therefore not have suffered any material and/or non-material damage.

Damage

115. The claimants’ damage is, on the one hand, material and consists of personal injury, psychological damage as a result of the injections, and economic damage as a result of a loss of income and assets as a result of the measures they had to undergo. On the other hand, their damage is non-material on account of grief over the injustice done to them and their beloved fellow human beings, including claimant 7, [claimant 7], who lost her life to this injustice, and of suffering and mental loss in the form of joy of life taken away. Even if the claimants had not received a Covid-19 injection, they would therefore have suffered material and non-material damage, albeit to a lesser extent.

V. Response to Bourla’s statement of defence

116. Bourla’s statement of defence covers no subjects other than those already raised above in this reply. [redacted] et al. have already dealt extensively with the preferred reality, the marketing authorisation, the Pfizer report of 30 April 2021, graphene oxide, the unlawful conduct, the causal connection and group liability. [redacted] et al. once again point explicitly to the absence of a medical pandemic and the great differences between Pfizer batches, so that for that reason alone there can be no question of a ‘vaccine’ or a valid marketing authorisation. To avoid unnecessary repetition, [redacted] et al. refer to their position set out above with regard to all subjects raised by Bourla.

117. Incidentally, here too it applies that [redacted] et al. maintain all their contentions from the summons, although it may be conceded to Bourla that the Pfizer report of 30 April 2021 was wrongly described by [redacted] et al. as a clinical test. The corrected and correct view of [redacted] has been put forward above in this reply.

118. In addition to what [redacted] et al. have already contended, they make the following further observations in further substantiation of Bourla’s liability.

119. In view of his knowledge of and experience with mRNA products, Bourla must be deemed fully aware of the fact, known in the medical world, that medical products based on mRNA technology and NLPs are highly risky for human health. For this reason the mRNA platform of the Covid-19 mRNA injections is in itself a bioweapon. [redacted] et al. expressly offer to prove this contention and in this connection once again expressly refer to chapter III of this reply.

120. In response to Bourla’s contentions at paragraph 95 et seq. concerning the differences between batches, [redacted] et al. observe that these differences are evidently different. To that end, data analyst Wouter Aukema, using data from the official databases and special software, made visually clear the extent and severity of the ‘side effects’ of various batches of Pfizer Covid-19 mRNA injections as

reported to the Paul Ehrlich Institute in Germany. As exhibit 130, [redacted] et al. submit Aukema’s visual representation, which shows that there are very great differences in the effects of batches. Aukema further discovered that in various postcode areas injections were administered that had no effect whatsoever and can have been nothing other than an apparent saline solution. Aukema compiled an overview of these postcodes (exhibit 131). [redacted] et al. expressly offer to prove the differences between Pfizer Covid-19 injection batches by the examination of Mr Aukema and of the witnesses/experts identified in chapter III. The differences between batches alone, including the apparent saline solutions, make it abundantly clear that this concerns the implementation of a project and not the combating of the pretended medical Covid-19 pandemic.

121. As regards the contentions of [redacted] et al. specifically concerning Pfizer batch EM0477, [redacted] et al. refer to an article from De Andere Krant dated 20 December 2024 (exhibit 132). This article shows that in the Netherlands no fewer than forty deaths were reported in a period of 11 days, the deaths being attributable to receiving a Covid-19 mRNA injection from Pfizer batch EM0477.

122. As regards this Pfizer batch EM0477, which can only be described as a ‘killer batch’, something even more remarkable is going on, as follows. No less than half of killer batch EM0477 was withdrawn from the free stock in the Netherlands at the beginning of February 2021. This appears from the registration concerning this killer batch, because it was only half delivered, and this delivery stopped after yet another death in connection with this batch had been reported to Lareb the day before, on 5 February 2021. Administration of this batch was then discontinued, which indicates that at least whoever intervened was aware that this batch was very deadly. The information concerning the registration of this batch in the Netherlands is submitted as exhibit 133.

123. As regards Bourla’s group liability, [redacted] et al. observe that Bourla, in his position, has knowledge of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, the Pfizer trials, the RKI documents, the pathological examinations etc. The fact that Bourla persists in denying all involvement and knowledge while meanwhile continuing to project the preferred reality makes him liable. For Bourla, too, it applies that he is also liable in connection with his unlawful omission to put a stop to this malicious project.

124. At paragraphs 107-109 of his statement of defence, Bourla addresses the question whether ‘Comirnaty’ is a product that works on the basis of gene therapy and responds to the contentions on this in the summons. In doing so Bourla relies on definitions from EU legislation. In this reply [redacted] et al. have taken their definitive position that there is no ‘vaccine’ at all but exclusively a bioweapon. In view of this, the application of the EU definitions concerning medicinal products can further be left open, because the

application of a bioweapon to the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., is by definition unlawful.

125. [redacted] et al. have provided conclusive proof that this is a bioweapon [fn 25] by demonstrating that Bourla’s contentions regarding the rapid breakdown of mRNA in the body and the local action of his ‘Comirnaty’ in the deltoid muscle of the arm are far-reaching lies that had no purpose other than to maximise the ‘willingness to be vaccinated’, i.e. to be injected with this bioweapon.

126. Finally, Bourla’s direct competitor, Stéphane Bancel of Moderna [fn 26], had already been informed in 2019 of the pretended pandemic (exhibit 118). Evidently this information concerning the project Covid-19: The Great Reset was known in advance to CEOs of companies in ‘vaccine development’. That therefore also applies to Bourla.

VI. Response to the statement of defence of Van Cann and Jansen

127. In this response by [redacted] et al. to the statement of defence of Van Cann and Jansen as well, only those contentions are addressed that have not yet been refuted or raised in this reply (in a more general sense or with regard to another defendant). To that end, the following.

128. At paragraph 4 of their statement of defence, Van Cann and Jansen contend that the claimants’ choice not to summon the employers of Van Cann and Jansen, but to hold them liable personally, is said to rest on a strategy devised by the Stichting Recht Oprecht [Recht Oprecht Foundation], of which [redacted] et al. (and their lawyers) are said to form part. In reality, however, the Stichting Recht Oprecht has no influence whatsoever on the proceedings or on the content of the procedural documents drawn up by the lawyers on the instructions of [redacted] et al. Van Cann and Jansen, who pretend to practise honest journalism, thereby show how they despise the Truth. The reason for summoning Van Cann and Jansen personally is evident: they personally acted unlawfully towards [redacted] et al. by, in the context of the implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, as co-implementers of this project, projecting a preferred reality onto the civilian population, as a result of which [redacted] et al. were misled and received a Covid-19 injection.

129. The acts and omissions of Van Cann and Jansen led to the preferred reality being broadcast with great transmitting power via De Telegraaf and the NOS. By placing [redacted] et al. in this preferred reality in this way (and by failing to provide a powerful counter-narrative), the misleading of [redacted] et al. went so far that they received Covid-19 injections. Had Van Cann and Jansen taken their journalistic responsibility, this would not have happened.

[fn 25] See in particular paragraphs 50 to 58 inclusive of this reply.

[fn 26] This name is composed of the words ‘MODE’ and ‘RNA’ and, no more than the meaning of the name Astra Ze Neca, is that a coincidence.

130. Bringing legal action against media legal entities makes no sense whatsoever in a case of great social and historical importance such as this one. It may be noted that De Telegraaf, as a legal entity, was prohibited for years after the Second World War from publishing a newspaper because of its Nazi propaganda during the Second World War, and nevertheless still exists. Nazi propaganda, too, is a preferred reality. Holding a media legal entity liable in a case such as this is therefore evidently – as history teaches – totally pointless.

131. NATO-led Information Operations and PsyOps in implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset have already been discussed above. In order further to clarify the position of the fully controlled media within them, including Van Cann and Jansen as the persons with ultimate journalistic responsibility, [redacted] et al. will go into this in depth in this section.

132. In the preferred reality NATO has no standing PsyOp organisation. The Truth, however, is that, in implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, such an organisation is indeed constantly present to keep everyone in the preferred reality. NATO / the USA (Pentagon) set up the so-called CJPOTF (Combined Joint Psychological Operations Task Force) for this purpose, in order to step up the intensity of the preferred reality. The CJPOTF forms the network within which the PsyOp activities are carried out.

133. Below is an organisation chart, with table of contents, of all NATO parties whose task it is to keep the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., in a preferred reality in implementation of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. This with the aim of ultimately arriving at a New World Order. The organisation chart shows that the ‘Product Development Centre’ (PDC) included in it must have all media platforms such as radio, TV, newspapers and internet at its disposal.

[Figure in the original: organisation chart; not reproduced in the text.]

134. PsyOps are carried out by specialised units under the direction of the CJPOTF. Their execution requires close coordination with Info Ops and other functions, such as military public affairs and Civil-Military Cooperation (CIMIC). International organisations such as the UN and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) contribute to the stabilisation and development of the PsyOp (preferred reality). Civil-military cooperation and interaction are essential for making a PsyOp succeed.

135. In the Netherlands, in support of the organisation as shown in the organisation chart, there is the Joint Intelligence, Surveillance, Target Acquisition & Reconnaissance Commando (JISTARC) and a Civil and Military Interaction Command (CMI Command), where around 500 people work continuously. Together with the support units in other NATO countries, this is an organisation involving many thousands of military personnel who devote themselves exclusively to manipulating facts and events in such a way that a preferred reality is projected onto the civilian population, including [redacted] et al.

136. Within the aforementioned CMI Command (CMIC) there is the Psyops platoon [fn 27], which focuses on psychological operations.

137. For PsyOps and Info Ops, complete control by means of NGOs and fully controlled (local) media is required in order to place and keep the civilian population in a preferred reality. In the Netherlands the Psyops platoon has access to the media and to influential persons, including Van Cann and Jansen. The manner in which NATO enforces the necessary complete control over the media and influential persons is described at paragraph A-22 (page 83) of NATO STANDARD AJP 3.19. A copy of this is submitted as exhibit 134.

138. NATO STANDARD AJP 3.19 (exhibit 134), at paragraphs 4.15 and 4.16, sets out that the leadership of CMIC must actively participate in the media landscape in such a way that they in fact stand behind the media makers, thereby shaping the media environment and the perceptions broadcast by the media. Paragraph 4.17 of the NATO STANDARD explains that the role of CMIC is to ensure that the civilian population accepts the broadcast preferred reality as a ‘new normal’. This explains the introduction by the media of terms such as ‘vaccinatiebereidheid’ [‘willingness to be vaccinated’] and ‘sneuvelbereidheid’ [‘willingness to fall in battle’], which, as part of a PsyOp, serve precisely this purpose.

139. Another essential component of CMIC is combating information harmful to the success of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, in other words what Van Cann and Jansen call ‘disinformation’. This combating takes place by means of PsyOps and InfoOps in the form of so-called ‘fact-checking’ and ‘debunking’. Van Cann and Jansen bear ultimate responsibility for this at the media channels they direct. As exhibit 135, [redacted] et al. submit a screenshot of the NATO website concerning ‘Covid-19 disinformation’.

140. In military terms, fact-checkers constitute ‘a capability’ for combating disinformation. During the pretended Covid-19 pandemic, the weekly reports of the ‘Monitoring Informatiedomein’ (MID) [Information Domain Monitoring] invariably referred to ‘actions taken’ where fact-checks were concerned. Even when the fact-checks themselves contained incorrect information. After all, the point was to guard the Covid-19 narrative.

141. In the context of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, Van Cann and Jansen ruthlessly followed the military instructions that reached them via the criminal organisational structure described here, as a result of which the entire media landscape in the Netherlands is controlled by NATO for the purposes of implementing the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. Had Van Cann and Jansen personally withheld their cooperation and fulfilled their journalistic task, they would instead have publicly exposed all this. That they did not do so weighs heavily against them.

[fn 27] A platoon in the Dutch army is a sub-unit of a company and, depending on the task, consists of some 20 to 40 soldiers headed by an officer: usually a lieutenant.

142. [redacted] et al. explicitly offer to prove the existence of the degree of organisation described here and the fact that Van Cann and Jansen allowed themselves to be directed by it, wholly neglecting their journalistic duties and responsibilities, as a result of which the Dutch population has been able to become the victim of the preferred reality projected in part by Van Cann and Jansen. Additional evidence is offered by [redacted] et al. through the examination under oath of retired Major General Van Kappen. Furthermore, as additional evidence of this, [redacted] et al. submit as exhibit 136 a screenshot of the CMIC website.

VI. Response to Gates’s statement of defence

143. In this response by [redacted] et al. to Gates’s statement of defence as well, only those contentions are addressed that have not yet been refuted or raised in this reply (in a more general sense or with regard to another defendant). To that end, the following.

144. Gates presents himself as a philanthropist in whom the world may place its trust because he supposedly does good and gives accurate information about health risks in relation to the disease Covid-19 and the Covid-19 injections developed against it. His statements in that regard are world news. He is one of the best-known people in the world [fn 28].

145. Gates, too, pretends not to have understood that the claims of the claimants concern the material and non-material damage the claimants suffer because they were placed by the defendants, including Gates, in a preferred reality and, in that preferred reality, suffered under wholly unnecessary measures. Setting up that preferred reality is precisely what Gates, as co-implementer of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, does by, for example, deploying the Gates Foundation to combat ‘virus infections’, including ‘corona’, and, as a ‘philanthropist’, setting up enormous flows of money as investments to combat ‘the disease Covid-19’. The videos shown by [redacted] et al. (exhibits 75 and 76 to the summons) illustrate how Gates himself projects the preferred reality onto the world population.

146. In his statement of defence, too, Gates does everything to maintain the preferred reality and thereby shows himself all the more to be a co-implementer of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. Gates, like the other defendants, also continues to maintain that the Covid-19 mRNA injections were safe and did not contain toxic or dangerous substances such as graphene oxide. Gates further claims that the administration of this bioweapon involved ‘informed consent’ on the part of [redacted] et al., which is expressly disputed and is not apparent from anything.

[fn 28] In this context ‘known’ by no means means ‘knowing’.

147. Gates further tries, in defence against his personal liability, to hide behind the façades of legal entities that are, every one of them, co-implementers of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. Gates can be very seriously reproached for his conduct, since as a co-implementer of that project he invested his fame and money as a ‘philanthropist’ in order, among other things, to increase the ‘willingness to be vaccinated’ of the world population, knowing that in reality genocide was thereby being committed by deploying a bioweapon. For the sake of good order it is noted that the project Covid-19: The Great Reset is being realised through all kinds of sectors in society that ultimately determine how society functions. Gates exerts his influence in all those areas.

148. Involving oneself with big money as a ‘philanthropist’ in the project Covid-19: The Great Reset – what Gates calls ‘investments’ – and cooperating with co-implementers in the context of that project is in itself already unlawful, and it is moreover more than foreseeable that [redacted] et al. will suffer damage as a result, or at least that the likelihood of damage is thereby increased. In view of the genocide committed as a project and the foreseeable worldwide damage resulting from the ‘Covid measures’ implemented in the preferred reality, the foreseeable damage ought to have restrained Gates from taking part in the group of co-implementers of the Covid-19: The Great Reset project. That there is unlawful conduct by the co-implementers within the group requires no further argument, just as it is crystal clear that, in view of his position in society, knowledge and experience, his participation in all this must be attributed to Gates.

149. [redacted] et al. point out once again that the CEO of Moderna already knew in 2019 what would come in the preferred reality and accordingly made production of the toxic Covid-19 injections for the following year ten thousand times as high (!). It is relevant here that the patent submitted by [redacted] et al. as exhibit 72 to the summons does indeed concern beta coronavirus mRNA injections and therefore – contrary to what Gates contends – has nothing to do with HIV. Gates acknowledges in his statement of defence that he has ‘invested’ in Pfizer and Moderna since as early as 2011 by way of this patent. Also relevant is the information concerning the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation submitted by [redacted] et al. as exhibit 73, which – again contrary to what Gates contends – shows precisely that in 2016 an agreement was concluded with Moderna that applied not only to mRNA injections against HIV but above all to ‘various infectious diseases’. In view of the aforementioned patent (exhibit 72 to the summons), it is therefore established that the main concern was the development of Covid-19 mRNA injections, with Gates, too, very clearly having prior knowledge of the pandemic that would be projected onto the world population in the preferred reality, by himself among others. It is a fact of common knowledge that Gates himself describes his investments in ‘vaccines’ as his best investments ever. Gates has channelled billions of dollars into the project Covid-19: The Great Reset in order to set up the New World Order. The investments in what he calls ‘vaccines’, including the toxic Covid-19 mRNA injections, form part of this. Below is an overview of these flows of money channelled by Gates, whether or not through the legal entities (façades) he uses.

[Figure in the original: overview of flows of money; not reproduced in the text.]

150. In order to present the financial interests or ‘investments’ in the co-implementers of the Covid-19: The Great Reset project (façades) clearly to your court, an overview of these amounts is included below by way of illustration.

[Table/figure in the original: overview of amounts; not reproduced in the text.]

151. In connection with the amounts paid by Gates for the projection of the preferred reality by media companies, Gates, under the façade of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, put USD 319,000,000 on the table under the façade of ‘Committed grants’. A specification of this sum is submitted as exhibit 137. With his money, fame, connections and legal entities, Gates has the ability to exert great influence, including on the WHO. In proof of that influence – which is in any case a fact of common knowledge – [redacted] et al. submit as exhibit 138 information from Fox News reporting on this on the basis of a Twitter post by Gates himself.

152. In view of the foregoing it is clear that while Gates (co-)organised the global pandemic exercises described in the summons and made his media appearances reaching billions of people worldwide, he had an interest in the Covid-19 pandemic planned in the preferred reality coming about, with – as rehearsed – far-reaching ‘Covid-19 measures’ having to follow.

153. Gates’s influence on the ‘corona policy’ of governments is characterised by the fact that, under cover of his legal entities, he interferes directly and personally in the roll-out of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset. An example of this is the direct contact Gates has with the then Prime Minister of New Zealand, Jacinda Ardern, trained and placed by the WEF. Gates rewarded Ardern with an amount of USD 30,000,000 for her efforts to raise the ‘willingness to be vaccinated’ in New Zealand as high as possible by intensely projecting the preferred reality there. Robin de Boer of Nine for News published a very informative article in this connection, which is submitted as exhibit 139. That article also shows Gates’s direct interference in Germany with his ‘Gates Foundation Paper’, which the German RKI had to apply. Also submitted with exhibit 138 is an article from Forbes dated 4 June 2022 showing the payment of USD 30,000,000 to Ardern, as well as evidence of the fact that Ardern was trained by the WEF.

154. Further serious evidence of Gates’s direct influence is his financial support for the British medicines authority MHRA (Medicines & Healthcare products Regulatory Agency). The MHRA played a very pernicious role in censoring very disturbing data that reached it at the start of the Covid-19 injection campaign. This went so far that the MHRA even explicitly asked the Minister of Health in January 2021 to use the EMA to suppress reporting on the disturbing data throughout Europe (‘to help kill the story’). This evidence consists of released WhatsApp messages from early January 2021, the start of the genocide with the Covid-19 injection campaign. The MHRA further played a very pernicious role in keeping under wraps the March 2024 report submitted above as exhibit 123, which showed the greatly increased risks of the aforementioned AESIs. This same MHRA is funded by Gates. Asked about the flows of money originating from Gates, the MHRA refused to release data on this, evidently because of influence exerted. That Gates carries on with all this and, in his statement of defence, denies his very great influence and entanglement with national authorities and ministers speaks volumes. As exhibit 140, [redacted] et al. submit information from the internet concerning the WhatsApps, the report withheld by the MHRA, Gates’s financial involvement and the MHRA’s refusal to disclose the flows of money originating from Gates.

155. In order, in this reply, to deal a final blow to the contention of all defendants that the Covid-19 injections do not contain dangerous substances, [redacted] et al. submit as exhibit 141 a peer-reviewed study from the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice and Research published on 11 October 2024. This shows that the experimental Covid-19 injections contain at least 55 elements that cannot be chemically identified and that all Covid-19 injections examined contain the dangerous heavy metal chromium. This study further shows that arsenic, nickel, cobalt, copper, tin, cadmium, lead, manganese and mercury are found in the Covid-19 mRNA injections.

VII Response to Kant’s statement of defence

156. At paragraph 238 of the summons, [redacted] et al. arrive at only one explanation regarding Kant’s remarks: Kant is lying. Having read Kant’s statement of defence, this explanation needs further clarification: Kant is lying through her teeth!

157. For a proper understanding of the contentions of [redacted] et al., [redacted] et al. first of all once again expressly point out that the term ‘side effects’ used by the defendants, including Kant, is derived from the preferred reality. The Truth, however, is that the Covid-19 injections are a bioweapon and that the so-called ‘side effects’ in the preferred reality are the damage intended by this bioweapon (a main effect). Where ‘side effects’ are referred to below, this therefore does not mean that [redacted] et al. follow the defendants in the preferred reality of ‘vaccines’ and their ‘side effects’.

158. Kant’s argument essentially comes down to this: in registering reports, Lareb used an internal reporting procedure such that no ‘signals’ became visible that required any intervention. In view of the numbers of reported deaths and batch-related serious side effects, this internal procedure qualifies as nothing other than the cover-up construction alleged by [redacted] et al. in the summons. Kant certainly did know of the many reports of serious side effects and of the great and striking differences between the batches. It is remarkable here that Kant states that she knew batch EM0477 to be a terrible killer batch and nevertheless continues to hide behind the internal systems and procedures that she herself set up in the period from 2013 onwards with the co-implementers of the Covid-19: The Great Reset project. After all, Kant states at paragraph 42 of her statement of defence:

‘No conclusions can be drawn from the number of reports relating to a specific batch number’

159. On 3 December 2020 an internal memo was drawn up by the RIVM, its Centre for Epidemiology and Surveillance of Infectious Diseases (EPI) under the direction of its head, Dr Susan van den Hof, in cooperation with Kant. In the preferred reality this memo was intended to impress on the staff responsible for registering side effects the necessity of registering batch numbers. A large part of the memo therefore concerns the importance of registering batch numbers, which in principle is entirely right, because without batch numbers effective control is not possible. [redacted] et al. submit three pages of this memo – obtained via a whistleblower – as exhibit 142.

160. In reality, however, this memo had a macabre purpose, namely projecting a preferred reality onto the staff responsible for registering ‘side effects’ in such a way that those staff would be made to believe that it is normal for a ‘vaccine’ to involve a ‘specific property of a batch’ and ‘serious side effects’. The idea that there would be such a thing as a ‘specific property

of a batch’ is introduced in this memo to make the reader in the preferred reality believe that it is normal that not all batches of a medical product are (or need be) the same. The memo is thereby a textbook example of neuro-linguistic programming of the reader, for which purpose this memo was written by Kant.

161. This memo states that registering batch numbers is important for being able to take decisions, giving as an example:

‘warning persons who have received a particular vaccine or a particular batch of a vaccine because of (inter)national safety signals…’.

162. The Lareb staff who were informed by this memo and processed the reports – and of course recorded the batch numbers for all reports – thus absorbed through this memo the false information that it is normal for there to be batches with specific properties and that, if something serious turned out to be wrong with a batch, people would be warned in that connection. The Truth, however, is that all batches ought to be identical and that, if that is not the case, intervention is required. The truth is also that no one is warned in connection with the serious side effects relating to a specific batch of a Covid-19 injection administered to him or her.

163. The memo was therefore necessary to keep the Lareb staff, too, under the illusion that, despite ‘signals’, there were no batch-specific problems for which victims of extremely toxic batches of Covid-19 injections would have to be warned.

164. A proper reading of this memo also shows that on 3 December 2020 Kant and Van den Hof were already aware that in the Covid-19 injection campaign that was to start the following month, various batches with ‘specific properties’ and ‘serious side effects’ would be distributed among the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al. It follows that Kant and Van den Hof did exactly what they were appointed to do in the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, namely misleading the public so as to make the large-scale Covid-19 injection campaign with Covid-19 injections possible. It is precisely for this reason that Kant set up a cover-up. That cover-up is crucial to keeping the ‘willingness to be vaccinated’ at a high level. In this way Kant and Van den Hof played a crucial role in the genocide taking place by means of a bioweapon. All bodies similar to Lareb and EPI worldwide applied the same macabre cover-up construction.

165. The Truth is that shortly after the start of the Covid-19 injection campaign in the Netherlands, Lareb was flooded with an enormous number of reports of serious side effects and deaths that had occurred shortly after a Covid-19 injection was administered. Kant had organised her organisation in such a way that there was insufficient capacity to process this stream of reports correctly. Despite this lack of capacity, in view of the foregoing it was therefore already entirely clear to Kant in advance that the bioweapon would destroy the health and lives of many people. [redacted] et al. have included below a graph of what

was actually reported in deaths in the period from 10 January 2021 to 25 March 2021 inclusive. It should be borne in mind here that the actual deaths (‘side effects’) are a multiple of this. It follows from this graph that the destruction of human lives actually began with the deployment of the bioweapon.

[Figure in the original: graph of reported deaths; not reproduced in the text.]

166. This overview makes abundantly clear that the more Covid-19 injections were administered, the more deaths occurred. The trend line shows that this increase in deaths occurred among people who had taken a Covid-19 injection shortly beforehand. Before the injection campaign there was no increase in deaths. Batch EM0477 alone accounted for no fewer than 33 reported deaths in the Netherlands in the period from 25 January 2021 to 5 February 2021 inclusive. To that end [redacted] et al. show the table below from the VAERS data.

[Table in the original: VAERS data; not reproduced in the text.]

167. As regards those who died from batch EM0477, too, it should be borne in mind that the actual number of deaths is much higher than the reported number. Wherever this ‘batch with specific properties’, as Kant calls it in the memo, was administered in Europe, it became a battlefield with many dead. In France 105 deaths were reported, in Germany 66, in Spain 34, in Belgium 24, in Norway 21, in Denmark 16, in Ireland 6, in Malta 6, in Switzerland 4 and in Estonia 3 [fn 29]. The deaths reported for the Netherlands in this ‘batch with specific properties’ concerned people over 65, 90 per cent of whom died in January and February 2021.

168. Killer batches such as EM0477, called by Kant ‘a batch with specific properties’, account for the vast majority of deaths occurring shortly after a Covid-19 injection is administered. Research from Denmark has shown that only four per cent of the Pfizer vaccines used in Denmark were responsible for 71 per cent of all reported side effects. Those four per cent comprised nine specific batch numbers deployed early in the vaccination campaign. They also proved to be linked to 47 per cent of all reported deaths (579) in the Scandinavian country. Kant’s contention that no conclusions can be drawn from the number of reports relating to a specific batch number is a flagrant lie.

169. That Kant is lying through her teeth also follows from an internal email dated 3 May 2021 concerning feedback on the CBG-Lareb-RIVM-VWS safety-monitoring consultation held on 29 April 2021. This email is submitted by [redacted] et al. as exhibit 143. It includes, among other things:

[fn 29] Source: European database (EudraVigilance)

‘…Lareb reports that they have received many reports of (deep vein) thrombosis in a very short time; in response they decided to carry out additional research, which they presented on Thursday in a separate meeting. The CBG stresses the importance of solid substantiation of findings. Only after the causality has been assessed can they bring something to the attention of the EU/AZ; for this, observational research alone is insufficient…’

170. The cover-up construction therefore works in such a way that, in the system set up by Kant, a report is totally pointless as long as its causality has not been assessed. It is established that Lareb is not, or is wholly insufficiently, capable of doing so. By way of further explanation, [redacted] et al. will – as far as they are able at this stage of the proceedings – get to the bottom of Kant’s cover-up. To that end, the following.

171. [redacted] et al. have already taken the position that all documents on which the defendants rely are derived from the preferred reality and have no evidential value whatsoever for the defendants’ contentions. That position expressly also concerns Kant. The defendants, and Kant in particular, are full of ‘scientific consensus’ in their statements of defence. The Truth, however, is that what the defendants call ‘scientific consensus’ is nothing other than the bag of tricks of malicious illusionists, in other words the preferred reality. The documents on which Kant relies are also, for anyone who wants to see and hear, nothing other than that. To show your court how Kant is lying through her teeth, a number of contentions from her statement of defence are quoted below and provided with commentary based on reason and true facts.

172. Paragraph 27 of Kant’s statement of defence states the following:

‘It is true that Lareb would in fact be able to produce overviews of registered side effects per batch number. However, Lareb has not done so to date because this is not meaningful for safety monitoring. Such overviews are not a suitable means of detecting possible batch-related problems. To detect possible batch-related problems, Lareb does carry out so-called ‘batch analyses’. During the COVID-19 pandemic this was done once every 2 weeks. Using an automated analysis tool, the spectrum of reported side effects per batch number is compared with the spectrum of the other batches. If certain side effects come up more often for a specific batch, these reports are looked at more closely. However, the foregoing does not result in a list, but in a signal. This signal indicates that a particular side effect occurs more often with a particular batch’

173. This quotation concerns a mendacious line of reasoning. After all, carrying out an effective ‘batch analysis’ (also) includes producing overviews of registered ‘side effects’ per batch number. Those overviews clearly show the difference in the ‘side effects’ of the individual batches. The ‘looking at more closely’ in relation to the incomplete batch analyses Kant writes about means, when all is said and done, nothing other than ‘doing nothing’ with the already deficient batch analysis, and is a cover-up. A proper reading of this quotation therefore leads to Kant’s unconditional acknowledgement of the claimants’ contention that there is a cover-up.

174. Paragraph 30 of Kant’s statement of defence states the following:

With regard to Lareb, the minister considered as follows:

‘Lareb has indicated that it does not have the requested documents, because such documents do not fit the way in which Lareb works. Lareb works with a two-weekly batch analysis. This batch analysis is part of the regular safety monitoring of vaccines. The batch analysis does not produce a list, as you requested, but only gives a signal if something occurs more often with a particular batch. The article ‘Optimizing Safety Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccines at the National Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb: One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Experience’, which can be consulted online, describes how safety monitoring was carried out specifically for COVID-19 vaccines. Furthermore, the results of the batch analyses are shared on Lareb’s website if an analysis yields results worth mentioning.’

175. The above quotation from Kant’s statement of defence serves to mask her cover-up construction. At first sight this quotation creates the false impression that ‘the safety monitoring of vaccines’ is well safeguarded because a procedure as described above exists. That procedure would then actually have to be about ‘safety monitoring of vaccines’. The Truth, however, is that this procedure does the opposite and constitutes irrefutable proof of Kant’s cover-up. To demonstrate this, [redacted] et al. submit as exhibit 144 the document, derived from the preferred reality and available online, ‘Optimizing Safety Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccines at the National Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb: One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Experience’. To that end, the following.

176. The first thing that strikes one about this document (exhibit 144) is that Kant herself is one of the authors. For that reason alone this document has a high ‘we at WC-Eend recommend WC-Eend’ content [a Dutch saying, after a toilet-cleaner advertisement, for self-recommendation]. As co-authors, this document – published in the preferred reality under exclusive licence to ‘Springer Nature Switzerland AG [fn 30]’ as a ‘research article’ – names: Ingrid Oosterhuis, Joep Scholl and Florence van Hunsel (all affiliated with Lareb), and Eugène van Puijenbroek, who besides Lareb is also affiliated with PharmacoTherapy, Epidemiology and Economics, University of Groningen, and the Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy. In short: the butcher is inspecting his own meat.

177. A further reading of this document exposes the pitfall that the authors of this document have dug for themselves and all co-defendants. To that end, the following. In this English-language document, which is unreadable or hard to read for the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., the false Covid-19 narrative is repeated. Next, an explanation is given of the two-weekly ‘batch analysis’, which turns out to be no more than a fully automated software process. In the right-hand column on page 68 of this document, the following is stated on this:

Standardised Morbidity Rates (SMR) were used to compare the number of spontaneously reported cases of the association of interest (Observed) in the COVID-19 vaccinated population with the Expected number based on Dutch background incidence rates within a risk window following immunisation, stratified per vaccine, dose, sex and age.

[fn 30] In the preferred reality, a large publisher of ‘academic literature’

178. For a proper understanding of Kant’s cover-up, this quotation first requires an explanation of the term ‘morbidity’. Morbidity is the number of people with a disease in relation to the number of individuals in the population concerned within a certain period of time; also called the disease rate. For every disease in the Netherlands there is a standardised morbidity ratio that sets these proportions of the occurrence of a particular disease in the Dutch population in a certain period against the total population. As an example, the morbidity of diabetes in the Netherlands in 2024 was approximately 6%. That means that 6 in 100 Dutch people had diabetes in 2024.

179. The automated Lareb process of ‘batch analysis’ set up by Kant is therefore based on a comparison of the standardised morbidity ratios in the Netherlands with the reporting percentage per morbidity for the Covid-19 vaccinations. This is – deliberately and maliciously – comparing apples with pears, because the under-reporting of side effects is not taken into account in this comparison (!). After all, ‘side effects’ are not reported until there is a suspicion that there is a connection with ‘the vaccination’, but people living in the preferred reality only rarely have that suspicion. After all, in the preferred reality there are no or hardly any ‘side effects’ of Covid-19 injections other than fever and pain at the injection site. All other ‘side effects’ are ‘very rare’ in the preferred reality. In a morbidity ratio, under-reporting plays a much smaller role. After all, for most people in the Netherlands with a disease (for example diabetes), that disease has been detected and registered, so that there is much less under-reporting for diseases than for ‘side effects’. For this reason alone it is clear why the batch analysis by Kant’s Lareb is a farce.

180. The Truth is that this farce is even more malicious than this. For what exactly did this batch analysis concern? Which ‘association of interest’ was it about? The answer to this can be read a few lines further on:

‘The batch analysis was performed for fever and for injection-site infection’

181. It is therefore a fact that the already corrupt batch analysis of Kant’s Lareb – in line with the false Covid-19 narrative – concerned only reports of fever and pain at the injection site (!). A batch analysis should of course be carried out for all reported side effects. Fever and injection pain are, moreover, a reaction that regularly occurs with all so-called ‘immunisations’ in the preferred reality.

182. The Truth, therefore, is that the ‘safety monitoring specifically for COVID-19 vaccines’ is in reality Kant’s cover-up. This cover-up plays a crucial role in maximising the ‘willingness to be vaccinated’ and the deception needed to be able to keep attacking the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., with a bioweapon.

183. In view of this cover-up by Kant, which must be deemed proven, it should no longer come as any surprise that the source data and results of Kant’s ‘batch analyses’, including the ‘heatmaps’ mentioned in the document, were not made available together with this document. The reason for this is clear: it is a cover-up.

184. [redacted] et al. have contended that Lareb was flooded with reports of ‘side effects’. To enable your court to form a picture of the extremely high number of reports of ‘side effects’ of the toxic Covid-19 injections, an explanation follows here.

185. The Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Medische Microbiologie [Dutch Journal of Medical Microbiology] 2019, volume 27, no. 3, states in a ‘scientific article’ entitled ‘Verschillende perspectieven op influenzavaccinatie bij zorgprofessionals’ [‘Different perspectives on influenza vaccination among healthcare professionals’], in the first column of page 139, that for the period 2010-2013 the reporting percentage for side effects of influenza vaccinations at Lareb was approximately 0.0059%. That is therefore 5.9 reports per 100,000 doses. [redacted] et al. submit this ‘scientific article’ as exhibit 145.

186. The annual report of Kant’s Lareb entitled ‘Meldingen van bijwerkingen na influenzavaccinaties, influenzaseizoen, rapportage influenza seizoen 2019-2020’ [‘Reports of side effects after influenza vaccinations, influenza season, report influenza season 2019-2020’] states on page 1 that well over three million Dutch people are vaccinated against influenza each year, and states on page 5 that in the 2018-2019 influenza season 491 reports of side effects were made to Kant’s Lareb. That translates into a reporting percentage of (less than) 0.016%. That is therefore (less than) 16.4 reports per 100,000 doses. [redacted] et al. submit this annual report as exhibit 146.

187. The aforementioned document written by Kant, ‘Optimizing Safety Surveillance for COVID-19 Vaccines at the National Pharmacovigilance Centre Lareb: One Year of COVID-19 Vaccine Experience’, states that Lareb received 184,411 individual reports for the ‘Covid-19 vaccinations’. That translates into a reporting percentage of 0.67% for the year 2021. That is therefore 670 reports per 100,000 doses. This relatively extremely high number of reports shows that Kant did not give a damn how many reports – the yardstick par excellence – were made. There were extremely many more than could be expected of a ‘safe vaccine’ that had been ‘tested over and over without cutting corners’ and that was touted as a ‘miracle’ in the preferred reality. No number of reports of ‘side effects’ whatsoever would be a reason for Kant to issue a warning to the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al. Kant thereby acted entirely in accordance with her assignment in the project Covid-19: The Great Reset.

188. The Truth is that if Lareb wanted to protect people against dangerous medical products, it would not ignore the scale and seriousness of the reports themselves as a yardstick. By doing so nonetheless, and by giving no warnings to the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., that brought the scale and seriousness of the reports to light, the cover-up stayed tightly sealed.

189. It is further noted that exhibit 4 submitted by Kant constitutes further proof of the cover-up, because it, too, contains nothing warning the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., of the life-threatening risks of the Covid-19 injections, which are in fact a bioweapon.

VIII. Closing remarks on the dispute (with regard to all defendants)

190. As set out in this reply, the proceedings conducted between the parties in the courtroom cannot be seen separately from the underlying spiritual battle. The word procedure comes from the Latin word ‘procedere’, which means roughly ‘to proceed’ or ‘to advance’. This means that in these legal proceedings the judgment of your court can only be given definitively once the proceedings have come to their end. The latter also applies to the underlying spiritual battle, on the understanding that the Last Judgment on the parties is given not by your court but by God Almighty, to each according to his works. This battle, too, is advancing and its outcome is not yet settled. The defendants can, through their works, influence this Last Judgment. Will they build the tower of Babel further, or will they tear it down?

191. The Last Judgment will be given according to the word of God Almighty.

And I saw a great white throne, and Him Who sat on it. From His face the earth and the heaven fled away, so that no place was found for them any more.

And I saw the dead, small and great, standing before God. And the books were opened, and another book was opened, namely the book of life.

And the dead were judged according to what was written in the books, according to their works. And the sea gave up the dead that were in it. Death and the realm of the dead also gave up the dead that were in them, and they were judged, each according to his works.

And death and the realm of the dead were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death. And if anyone was not found written in the book of life, he was cast into the lake of fire.

(Revelation 20:11-15 HSV)

IX. Offer of evidence and allocation of the burden of proof

Insofar as the burden of proof rests on [redacted] et al. pursuant to Article 150 DCCP, [redacted] et al. offer to prove all contentions by all legal means. All defendants may be heard as witnesses, all of whom are co-implementers of the project Covid-19: The Great Reset, know the ins and outs of this project and can testify from their own observation how they projected a preferred reality onto the Dutch people, including [redacted] et al., and caused damage to the Dutch population, including [redacted] et al., with the Covid-19 measures they implemented and/or propagated. Furthermore, [redacted] et al. refer to the specific offers of evidence included in this reply.

Specifically with regard to the contention of [redacted] et al. that the spike protein expressed by the Covid-19 mRNA injections is found everywhere, continuously and permanently in the bodies of people injected with Covid-19 mRNA, [redacted] et al. offer to have Doctor (med.) Ute Krüger and Professor Doctor (med.) Walter Lang heard by your court as witnesses under oath.

With regard to the contention of [redacted] et al. that the Covid-19 injections are bioweapons with which genocide is being committed in the context of the Great Reset in order to arrive at a New World Order, [redacted] et al. once again refer to the offer of evidence made in chapter III of this reply to have Ms Catherine Austin Fitts, Dr Mike Yeadon, Ms Alexandra Latypova MBA, Ms Katherine Watt and Dr Joseph Sansone B.A. heard by your court under oath.

As regards the allocation of the burden of proof, the defendants bear the burden of proving the facts and contentions they derive from their own preferred reality, including the existence of a medical pandemic and the existence of the non-existent Sars-Cov2 virus.

WITH CONCLUSION

Deed requesting the amendment (increase) of the claim.

Tot persistit!

Arno van Kessel Peter Stassen