Home / Projects / Stop COVID Vaccines Now
End the mRNA experiment
If you want it off the market, this is the case.
Our federal mandamus asks a judge to make the Pentagon produce the report Congress was owed before any biological agent was tested on people — and to make FDA finally say whether these products are gene therapy. The government's first response is due Nov 7.
The case has been carried pro se as far as pro se can carry it. The Mandamus Legal Fund brings real counsel onto it — the kind not one of us could pay for alone, and all of us can pay for together.
and advises while the case continues pro se.
starting with our opposition to their motion.
and carries it all the way.
Monthly gifts keep this ongoing project going full steam ahead. A single gift covers a mailing. A monthly gift covers a case.
Secure checkout by Donorbox · Interest of Justice is a 501(c)(3), EIN 99-2410252. Can't see the form? Give on Donorbox ↗
Prefer a check, a donor-advised fund or a monthly partnership? Every way to give →
The roadmap
Every case it takes to stop them.
One line of cases, in order. Each step builds the record the next one stands on. Tap a step for the details.
FDA petition P-1807
Asks FDA whether the COVID mRNA products are gene therapy under its own definitions. FDA asked for evidence instead of denying it, and IoJ filed it on time.
The 32 Points →2In court · response due Nov 7The federal mandamus
No. 1:26-cv-01543 (D.D.C.). Make the Pentagon produce the § 1520a(d) report and make FDA decide the petition. This is the case the fund puts counsel on.
How the case works →3NextA court defines the products
Once they are defined, the consent laws attach — 21 CFR 50, the Common Rule, 10 U.S.C. § 980, § 1520a, the emergency-use right to refuse.
The six consent laws →4After thatOff the market
Referrals, injury claims, reversals, and getting these products off the market — built on that record. You can't prosecute what's never been defined.
The record so far →Fronts abroad, funded separately: the Costa Rica Nuremberg case and Sue the WHO. The full picture: Stop Crimes Against Humanity.
Case · No. 1:26-cv-01543 (D.D.C.)
Our federal mandamus.
A writ of mandamus asks a court to order a federal officer to do a duty the law already requires. No damages. No accusation. Just — do your job.
Count I · Department of Defense
Produce the § 1520a(d) report.
50 U.S.C. § 1520a(d) requires a report to the Senate and House Armed Services Committees before any test of a biological agent on human subjects — and the test can't go ahead until 30 days after they get it. The case asks the court to make the Pentagon produce it.
Read § 1520a ↗Count II · FDA
Decide our citizen petition.
Citizen Petition FDA-2025-P-1807 asks whether the COVID mRNA products are gene therapy under FDA's own definitions. FDA's 180 days under 21 CFR 10.30(e)(2) ran on Dec 13, 2025. The case asks the court to make FDA answer on the merits.
The petition & 32 Points →The court clock
What happens next.
Proofs of service filed
Every defendant served; the docket sets the answer date.
Government's first response due
On the court's docket. Most likely a motion to dismiss.
Our opposition due
Under the court's local rule, 14 days after their motion.
Their reply due
Then the judge decides — no fixed date.
Questions people ask
Plain answers.
Aren't you suing the administration that's actually helping?
A mandamus names whoever holds the office today, because only the current officer can perform the duty. Under Federal Rule 25(d) the next officeholder is substituted automatically. It isn't an accusation against a person.
A court order is also what lets a willing official overrule the career staff who buried this for years. Agencies outlast administrations.
Why isn't IoJ the party in the case?
An organization can appear in federal court only through a licensed attorney — Rowland v. California Men's Colony, 506 U.S. 194 (1993). IoJ couldn't afford one, so our founder filed pro se in her own name. That's exactly what the Mandamus Legal Fund is for.
Is the government late?
No. The court's docket lists the government's first response as due Nov 7, 2026. That's the date to watch.
What does winning look like?
The case asks for the § 1520a(d) report and a real FDA answer. What a court orders is the court's call. Our argument is that once the products are defined, the consent laws attach — and everything that follows is built on that record.
Help bring counsel onto the case.
The case has been carried pro se as far as pro se can carry it. The fund is open, and there's room in it for you.