Consent is the line. We hold it in court.

After the Second World War, the world wrote one rule for medicine first: no experiment on a person without their voluntary consent. Interest of Justice exists to make governments keep that rule — not with slogans, but with filings a court has to answer.

See the cases ↓Give where it's needed most ↓

What the words mean

Three sources. Read them yourself.

1947 · The Nuremberg Code ↗

"The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential."

The Code's first principle, written after the Nuremberg Doctors' Trial. Ten rules for any experiment on people.

1998 · Rome Statute, Article 7 ↗

What "crimes against humanity" means in law.

The international definition: listed acts committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against a civilian population, with knowledge of the attack.

Today · U.S. law

Six U.S. laws carry consent into force.

The U.S. never enacted the Nuremberg Code (Costa Rica did write it into its medical ethics law). These six U.S. statutes and regulations carry it — and IoJ's U.S. cases are built on them.

IoJ's position — and what it isn't

IoJ argues that the COVID countermeasures were given to people without the consent U.S. and international law require, and has filed crimes against humanity complaints with the WHO's ethics office, which referred them to national authorities.

These are IoJ's legal arguments and complaints. No court has ruled that crimes against humanity occurred. That is exactly why the cases below exist: to put the questions in front of courts that have to answer them. Nothing on this site is legal advice.

The fronts

Three cases. One line.

Each case has its own fund. Gifts to a case fund are restricted to that case.

⚖Mandamus · response due Nov 7

In U.S. federal court

Stop COVID Vaccines Now

The federal mandamus and FDA petition P-1807 — make the government define the products, so the consent laws attach.

Read the case and give →✦Case live · funding counsel

Hearings and the Costa Rica case

Nuremberg Hearing Project

The hearings on the record, and the Costa Rica case where the appeals court said the experts must be heard.

Read the case and give →◎Raising the legal fund

From the treaty hearings to court

Sue the WHO

The complaints the WHO's ethics office referred to national authorities, and the court challenge next.

Read the case and give →

Sister movement · its own site and fund

Stop Agenda 2030 — the 17 UN goals, decoded.

Learn more →

Where it's needed most

Not sure which case? Give here.

Unrestricted gifts go to whichever case has the nearest court deadline, and to the research and records every case stands on.

Interest of Justice is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, EIN 99-2410252. Gifts are tax-deductible to the extent allowed by law.

Secure checkout by Donorbox · Interest of Justice is a 501(c)(3), EIN 99-2410252. Can't see the form? Give on Donorbox ↗
Prefer a check, a donor-advised fund or a monthly partnership? Every way to give →